Registered: Jul 2005
Location: The Height of New Colossus
quote:
Originally posted by Psygnosis
you seemed to have missed my point and overshadowed it with some lame comment.
OK, you want to talk about Greece? Sure they were a powerful nation after Persia went down? But if a nation like Persia and Greece can go down, why do you actually think America isn't going to go. By the way it's playing the game, i give America less than 50 years to go down.
my point is, what makes you so confident that America will not follow suit. America is run by corrupt politicians and many blinded arrogant followers. You don't think they will follow suit of these two great empires?
And you can bring up any theory about why you think Persia might have been that way but remember, they were a superpower of 80% of the world, still have yet to see any other superpower ever gain that much landmass.
They were strong, so don't bring up any stupid comments. Persia when under Cyrus and Darius were unbeatable. When these 2 Kings died, it was overrun by corrupt persians who were too confident by their stand on the world and they lost vision.
America will do the same.
ERRR WRONG!
Once again, READ WHAT I'VE SAID. YOU CANNOT...CANNOT COMPARE PERSIA WITH AMERICA. If I need to rewrite the history of the Persian empire and it's collapse then you shouldn't be posting on the topic.
And there was no such thing as a Greek empire ...ever . Just city states that fought the Persians together. Your comparison makes no sense dude.
I do get what you're saying but you're saying it wrong which makes it hard to take you seriously.
Once again there was no such nation as Greece. Persia was not unbeatable during Xerxes either and it was defeated on more than one "fluke" throughout the years. And it has done so because of it's own internal problems, mainly because of slavery labor and armed forces. meanwhile Greek city-states had citizen soliders and mercenaries.
America is still on the rise, therefore it's not about the happen. There's no real indication that it's about to happen. No lame speculations puhleaze.
Originally posted by h0tsweetbabyd0l
it doesn't surprise me at all china is on her way to become # 1 in 50 yrs or something ...in so many fields now China is already number 1 ....i've read a lot of magazines about this subject and what was scary is that they send a lot of spy all around the world to copy the technics ....a lot of chinese students turn to work for the government and all
and my dad he is an engineer in aeronautic for EADS the ones who are building the airbus 380 and others planes told me the chinese accept to buy the planes if they can have some technics and plans .....otherwise they simply refuse all they want is the know how so they can do it again by themselves
Yes, but although their industrial espionage is really functioning well, before they themselves start creating new technologies instead of stealing them from other nations, they can never be #1.
___________________
1+1=10
Nov-28-2005 14:23
Moongoose
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Celje, Slovenia
True but a lot can change in a hundred years so i wouldnt write the chinese off yet
___________________
Nov-28-2005 15:03
IDarkISwordI
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Clay Center, USA
What makes China below a superpower already . Hell people, China has more people in thier military than the US has in population. WorldFact Book: US WorldFact Book: China
I'm pretty sure that if they wanted to take control of much of the world, they wouldnt have a huge problem doing it. They have nuclear devices, they have a 375M+ man-strong army and enough natural resources to cut off everyone and still get by. How is this even a debate when its already a truth?
___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."-Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller
Nov-28-2005 18:34
IDarkISwordI
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Clay Center, USA
Heh. Except I think youre forgetting how fucking bloated our government is on spending. Did you know that there is an Army sponsered nascar car and driver? How about the fact that the Army paid programmers to design a total conversion for Unreal Tournement 2003/2004 and then gives it out for free. There are plenty of examples within the government where spending is very very blaoted. Dont be blinded by the fact that the US spends $460B on its troops. Especially when you think about how shitty we are doing in Iraq. I mean seriously... A lot of the troops, personel and even vehicles are underarmored for combat. Does that sound like $460B going to good use? I think the answer to that is obvious.
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: The Height of New Colossus
quote:
Originally posted by IDarkISwordI
What makes China below a superpower already . Hell people, China has more people in thier military than the US has in population. WorldFact Book: US WorldFact Book: China
I'm pretty sure that if they wanted to take control of much of the world, they wouldnt have a huge problem doing it. They have nuclear devices, they have a 375M+ man-strong army and enough natural resources to cut off everyone and still get by. How is this even a debate when its already a truth?
Cheers,
Zac
oh a debate? i'd love me some. let's see. not to mention the fact that if China did indeed decide to take on the whorld, they would get crushed in a week. Nuclear devices? o rly? who are they going to use it on? North America, Europe and Israel? Oh, yeah good luck with getting too far with that before China becomes a glass creator whilst the rest don't get too hurt. Their spending is not even near the US's or anything and what you've said about the videogames and shit isn't even 1 percent of the spending. Furthermore, they cannot even dream to compete in military and weapons technology.
Also, a military doesn't make a country a superpower
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by IDarkISwordI
...and enough natural resources to cut off everyone and still get by.
Then why are they going outside their own country and gobbling up global resources like a man on fire?
They a) don't have the resources and b) what resources they do have, are woefully underdeveloped, hence the spending spree.
___________________
"...End? No, the journey doesn't end here. Death is just another path...one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back, and all change to silver glass...and then you see it...
...white shores...and beyond...the far green country under a swift sunrise."
Nov-29-2005 03:11
The Greek
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: New York City
Let's not forget the most important resource of all: water. What water they have is polluted due to the cities built by rivers. Water is what they don't have and without that you can't do anything.
___________________
Nov-29-2005 17:22
weymouth
aka Poe
Registered: May 2003
Location: Delaware
The world will become a conglomerate of alliances creating a bi-polar world before another single country will take the place of the United States as the SuperPower. The U.S. has only been in a Unipolar world since 1991 with the fall of the USSR. The question that you should be asking is what countries would China create an alliance with to create a balance of power? Russia? EU? Japan? India?
My opinion is that with the emergence of India that the United States, India, Japan, and Australia will become one side which will make the Russians, Chinease, and EU be forced to ally together. There are already hints of these alliances possibly forming with Chinease and Russian military manuevers and the continued seperation between the EU and America.
The Middle East will still have wars and terrorism but with the United States with a stong base and foothold in Iraq to balance possible interference from the other countries in that region. The Iraq war gave the U.S. a perfect opportunity to create this Middle East strategic advantage to balance power in the area between the EU, Russia, and China.
What will truely test this hypothesis is what happens when China eventually invades Taiwan.
Nov-29-2005 19:33
josh4
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: New York City
A lot of these predictions sound like the synopsis to poorly written TV dramas.
Nov-29-2005 20:32
Lepanto
Makes you HORNY!
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: The Height of New Colossus
You must be kidding if you think that the EU will NOT allign itself with the US...oh wait too late it already is