 |
|
|
|
 |
Wyndham
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by simms327
after owning two canons, powershot S200 and SD230, i will never buy anything else.
canons take clean crisp beautiful pictures, are small, durable, and have good battery life. for a point and shoot camera, IMO there is no better. |
lol i can't count the amount of times i've dropped mine on floors of clubs.
and as far as shutter speed goes, the bigger the lense, the more light it lets through, the less time the shutter needs to be open. Thats why if you go too small, theres just nothing you can do about blurryness.
i still say the the sd500 is a bit overboard, sd400 or 450 is a better choice unless the cash isn't an issue
|
|
Nov-30-2005 02:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
TRANCEEEE
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: May 2004
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
Nov-30-2005 04:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
chinamon
el shit disturbo

Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Markham, ON
|
|
|
Nov-30-2005 15:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
Billche
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
|
|
if size is an issue, the SD500 is a great camera. My cousin has one, and it takes excellent pictures. If size is not as much of an issue, or cost, then I would go with one of cannons S series cameras. I have a friend with an S70, and it takes phenomenal pictures. The quality of the lens surpasses any of the compact pocketsize cameras, and it really isnt that much larger. It has an assload of features that you would expect only on an SLR, and works great.
The latest version, the S80, is a little sleeker, and has a higher resolution (8 megapixel) although it is fairly pricy.
|
|
Nov-30-2005 19:13
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:09.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|