|
in la there is a shittonne more people and a shittonne more traffic, but with that comes bigger and nicer clubs and more international dj talent (although we got digweed, tenaglia, and svd and you guys didn't! ...for once  ). weather, there's no doubt sf wins... the air is always fresh, no smog or haze, never ever gets too hot, and a million microclimates in the bay so if you don't like 60 degree weather you can drive 30 miles east and get 90 degree weather on the other side of the foothills. sf, or anywhere on the penninsula will be more expensive living than most of la though. the night life in la is better, but if you like outdoor activities, sf/bay area wins. surf in santa cruz all day, drive to tahoe and snowboard the same evening--it's been done  . there's yosemite 3 hours east, tahoe 3 hours north, monterey 2 hours south, plus in the city of sf itself there's ALWAYS something happening no matter what you're into. the best part about that is everything's a mile or two drive/walk away, whereas in la it's much more spread out. if you can't live without beaches though, then la wins. the summer heat makes for perfect beach days, though the beaches have been getting more ghetto over the last few years. hb to sd ftw. for the most part la lifestyle is much faster, people are more abrasive, but the chics are hotter. they are both great places in different ways, but i'd say socal fits the young party lifestyle more, and sf is better for the more laidback leisure lifestyle. probably cause our chronic is better! 
___________________
  
|
