Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Musical preferance and IQ
Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Aquarian
king of no pants



Registered: May 2005
Location: Laval, Quebec

Time signatures aren't the only thing that makes music complex. Layers of simple elements make something complex. In that sense, Dance music is generally some of the most complex music I've ever heard, beat only by Jazz (generally speaking). You can just look at the ammount of elements and partitions present in a track. In a rock band you'd have something like two guitars, a singer, a drummer... 4 or 5 partitions total. In a trance track you could have anywhere from 20 to a hundred.

Anyways - as for the IQ thing, it's complete bullshit. Not only is IQ not really a good measure of anything to begin with, I really doubt anyone would have any credible research data that could correlate something like musical taste to IQ. There's just way too many factors in play; acessibility, exposure, culture, social context, economic context, you name it.

Old Post Mar-15-2006 02:21  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Aquarian Click here to Send Aquarian a Private Message Add Aquarian to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Dark^Tremor
Guest



Registered: Not Yet
Location:

didn't you just read where he stated why busy harmonies don't make it complex? jeez.

BUT NO NO IT DOEZNT, HERE'S FIVE OF MY FAVORIT TARNCE AN PORGRESSSIVE ARTISTS WHOM MAKE MUZAK WITH BUSY HARMONIES HENCE ARE COMPLEX!

Old Post Mar-15-2006 04:04 
Add  to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
vinnie97
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2004
Location: North TX

quote:
Originally posted by Ishkur
yeah yeah yeah, I know. I have some music in triplet timing. But that's just a small sliver of the edm spectrum as to be negligent.

And let's be realistic here: fucked up IDM or downtempo music set to bizzare time signatures isn't what the poster was getting at, was he?

Hell if I know, I won't claim to know of the entirety of his original intentions.

And to that other poster who mentioned BT/Chicane: If you're going to make mention of them as putting more effort into music-making in the realm of dance music, then you have to mention Way Out West as well, whose music has crossed several sub-genres of dance music and they've done it (and still do) with a grace and talent at least on a level comparable to the above two.

However, all of the above artists have been guilty of loop-based works and sticking to the 4/4 time signature completely...but I don't think that makes them unintelligent, just more approachable and more listenable.

Old Post Mar-15-2006 04:17  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for vinnie97 Click here to Send vinnie97 a Private Message Add vinnie97 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Spirit5
Nobody



Registered: Jun 2005
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by vinnie97
And to that other poster who mentioned BT/Chicane: If you're going to make mention of them as putting more effort into music-making in the realm of dance music, then you have to mention Way Out West as well, whose music has crossed several sub-genres of dance music and they've done it (and still do) with a grace and talent at least on a level comparable to the above two.



Yeah WOW too. I deleted my post because I knew it was going to turn into a flame fest/argument as people misinterpret and twist what I say on here all the time (don't like to deal with it). A lot of the artist that have put more emphasis on compositions based around albums, and not based around just singles, are what I was talking about. But the other artists have potential too, those who don't put emphasis on albums, but just release singles. Maybe "complex" isn't exactly the right word, but they are certaintly more sophisticated and in some instances "complex" then some of the other dance music out there...

Last edited by Spirit5 on Mar-15-2006 at 04:30

Old Post Mar-15-2006 04:23  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Spirit5 Click here to Send Spirit5 a Private Message Add Spirit5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
thoughtlessjex
Yakkity Yak



Registered: May 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina

quote:
If you want complex music, you would try for really odd or bizarre time signatures like 9/13 (Zappa was a master of this), and really avant-garde scales like Archytas' Enharmonic 8-tone scale or the 19-equal scale or Harry Partch's really fucked up 43-tone scale, which sounds practically atonal to the western ear trained to the standard 12-tone scale, and completely out of sync if you try to count the measures in multiples of 4.

If you're trying to suggest that a piece of music like Take 5 is more complex than a tune like Underworld - Spikee, you realy need to check your definition of complex. A song can have a novel time signature, but if the time is the only point of the song, then it's just that: novelty.

As to whether it's more sophisticated or not, I suppose that's really up to the listener anyway, in which case, the OP's point kind of makes sense. A person's taste in music is somewhat related to their personality, or at least what they view as sophisticated and if they care whether they're sohpisticated or not. A person can think themself sophisticated for listening to Wilco, or Sasha, or Richie Hawtin, or 65 Days of Static, for all I care. Are they sophisticated? Maybe, maybe not. Then again, there are people (*cough*Ishkur*cough*) who think they're even more sophisticated because they've realized that music doesn't make you sophisticated, and so tout their tastes in shitty music to show that it really doesn't matter to them. There are also the people that genuinely don't care and listen to whatever the radio plays for them. They may be the most sophisticated of us all; after all, they're not arguing about this bullshit on the internet.


___________________

www.jexmusic.com - My website

Old Post Mar-15-2006 04:24  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for thoughtlessjex Click here to Send thoughtlessjex a Private Message Add thoughtlessjex to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
cherrybarry
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2005
Location: soul train

and so they lived...happily ever after

Old Post Mar-15-2006 04:49  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for cherrybarry Click here to Send cherrybarry a Private Message Add cherrybarry to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
*InVeRs3*
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2004
Location: E-Thuggin TA.com members

It's funny how these tests never show the numbers. I bet you the points are either above or below 5, that's not really a big gap in intelligence.

I personally think IQ tests don't work. They're culturally biased, and the human brain is complex.

And I also agree on what thoughtless has said.


___________________

Last edited by *InVeRs3* on Mar-15-2006 at 07:11

Old Post Mar-15-2006 07:03  Philippines
Click Here to See the Profile for *InVeRs3* Click here to Send *InVeRs3* a Private Message Add *InVeRs3* to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
epdarks
mnb4fl



Registered: Sep 2005
Location: mpls mn

Orchestral has us owned as far as complexity. Plus they actually have to play shit, on time, in tune. I personally would argue it takes the most intellegence to comprehend/write/play.

I like to think of trance as orchestral for the digital generation, which is both good and bad.

Or maybe I'm on crack. Good thread though.

Old Post Mar-15-2006 07:53  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for epdarks Click here to Send epdarks a Private Message Visit epdarks's homepage! Add epdarks to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
R!CH
check signal



Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill

i agree that classical/orchestral/symphonic is the most complex of all music. it has one important aspect that electronic lacks: the acoustic imaging and staging of a hundred analog instruments which deliver nuance that give $100,000 speakers a reason to exist.


___________________

Old Post Mar-15-2006 08:21  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for R!CH Click here to Send R!CH a Private Message Add R!CH to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ishkur
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC

quote:
Originally posted by Aquarian
Layers of simple elements make something complex.


No they don't. Key changes and melodic drift create complex melodies. But none of that is found in trance, which generally only uses one key/melody which loops every 8-16 bars, 64 times. In other words: The melodic drift never evolves beyond a simplified, predictable pattern. That's not complexity, that is the musical equivalent of a Dick & Jane primer to english literature. See Dick Run. Run Dick run. Jane sees Dick run.

You want complex harmonies and melodic key changes, go listen to classical music.

Old Post Mar-15-2006 09:25  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Ishkur Click here to Send Ishkur a Private Message Visit Ishkur's homepage! Add Ishkur to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Ishkur
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC

quote:
Originally posted by thoughtlessjex
A song can have a novel time signature, but if the time is the only point of the song, then it's just that: novelty.


I never said that an avant-garde time signature is the only way to make complex music, but it's a good start.

My beef was only with the OP who insisted that his loop-and-sample-based music was more sophisticated than other people's loop-and-sample-based music. Which is wrong, not to mention stupid.

Old Post Mar-15-2006 09:28  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Ishkur Click here to Send Ishkur a Private Message Visit Ishkur's homepage! Add Ishkur to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
RickyM
*



Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Northern Ireland

http://musicmavericks.publicradio.o...intonation.html

There's some samples of Harry Partch.


___________________
Signature Suspended as it was deemed offensive

Old Post Mar-15-2006 10:12  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for RickyM Click here to Send RickyM a Private Message Visit RickyM's homepage! Add RickyM to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Musical preferance and IQ
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackpls help id this:curius but nice trance track [2003] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackThera - Acid Pit [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!