 |
|
|
|
 |
shaolin_Z
Hei Hu Quan

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas, USA: TXTA #102
|
|
|
Apr-15-2006 02:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
-])ark-Maverick
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
|
|
wow, I can't believe no one is actively supporting PETA on this forum. You first have to realise that PETA has an extremely sound argument:
We should, at all cost, prevent un-necessary suffering
Animals suffer un-nessecarily
We should, at all cost, prevent un-necessary animal suffering
We are doing harm onto these animals because they are a difference species, not because they feel pain. It's like saying, I'm going to cuz you pain because you are native americian, or I'm not going to let you vote because you are female. Race and Sex have nothing to do with pain or the right to vote. Animals can feel pain, yet we continue to hurt them. Sure, we like to eat me, we like the taste, but you forget that that steak was once a 'sentient' being. A being capable of pain and suffering. The analogy of Racism and Sexism are quite clear. Many un-educated people will reply, "I like steak" or "mmmm... steak". So childish, grow up, mature. Look at the argument, look at the arguments, and it's easy to see the right answer. I'm convinced that in our lifetime, we will see a great movement towards more animals rights, and all of you opposed, will be just like those that took lightly and supported Racism.
To anyone that cares to enlighten themselves, "In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave" by Peter Singer is a great book. There are numerous essays outlining the bases of these arguments. I doubt anyone can read that book and deny his conclusion. The only way to do so is thru ignorance
|
|
Apr-20-2006 01:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
kush paintings
Balance 005 Romantic
Registered: Jun 2004
Location:
|
|
|
Im sorry, but what I dont understand is where do you draw the line. You say you want more animal rights, then as long as we are providing rights for other species, where is the line drawn. Is swatting a fly all of a sudden cruel and forbiedden? Personally I dont see the difference between stepping on an ant and killing a cow, but I think some would disagree. If so, why?
___________________
Lost Souls
|
|
Apr-20-2006 04:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
-])ark-Maverick
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
|
|
The argument is with regards to pain and suffering. Flys, ants and most insencts lack the biological complexity required for physical pain. The line is then drawn only where suffering begins. Fish, for example, feel little/ no pain when they are killed (it's not like finding nemo here). This is what the entire argument hinders on; the ability to feel pain. We used the same deductive reasoning when considering if slavery was really justifiable. My question, is why is slavery wrong? Your response, because they are members of our own species. Then comes my crucial, and most contraversial point, why should species determine who gets to suffer? My point is, why should animals, when they clearly are capable of suffering, be subjected to it? I'm not against eating meat, only factory farmed meat where conditions are appalling. I hope this answers your concern... I look forward to more 
|
|
Apr-20-2006 05:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
Moongoose
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Celje, Slovenia
|
|
|
Im sory, what?
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
wow, I can't believe no one is actively supporting PETA on this forum. You first have to realise that PETA has an extremely sound argument: |
O Rly?
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
We should, at all cost, prevent un-necessary suffering |
Just the unnecessary? I figure if your goal is to stop suffering migh as well go all out and stop the necessary suffering(which supposebly exist based on this argument) as well. No reason to get the job half done.
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
Animals suffer un-nessecarily |
So do people, whats your point?
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
We should, at all cost, prevent un-necessary animal suffering |
Why focus just on preventing animal suffering when you included them in in the first sentance? Oh, right. PETA doesnt care about people.
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
We are doing harm onto these animals because they are a difference species, not because they feel pain. |

| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
It's like saying, I'm going to cuz you pain because you are native americian, or I'm not going to let you vote because you are female. Race and Sex have nothing to do with pain or the right to vote. |

| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
Animals can feel pain, yet we continue to hurt them. Sure, we like to eat me, we like the taste, but you forget that that steak was once a 'sentient' being. A being capable of pain and suffering. |
So whats your point? Its not like only animals get killed or feel pain daily? Other sention beings, like people for instance get killed or have pain inflicted on them by other people on the daily basis also, and they are the same species. So much for the racism argument.
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
The analogy of Racism and Sexism are quite clear. |
Must remember to pick up a new pair of glasses becouse i even though this analogy is so clear i still fail to see it.
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
Many un-educated people will reply, "I like steak" or "mmmm... steak". So childish, grow up, mature. Look at the argument, look at the arguments, and it's easy to see the right answer. I'm convinced that in our lifetime, we will see a great movement towards more animals rights, and all of you opposed, will be just like those that took lightly and supported Racism. |
What arguments? You havent given a single valid one to support your cause. With arguments like yours you will not only fail to see any great movement tawards animal righs in your lifetime, but it is much more likely that people in general will stop listening to you all together on the count that some day they will get fed up with all the BS you are throwing into their faces.
| quote: | Originally posted by -])ark-Maverick
To anyone that cares to enlighten themselves, "In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave" by Peter Singer is a great book. There are numerous essays outlining the bases of these arguments. I doubt anyone can read that book and deny his conclusion. The only way to do so is thru ignorance |
Ill try to pick that one up just for the fun of it but i doubt any library aound has one.
___________________
|
|
Apr-20-2006 17:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:51.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|