|
to me it seemed there wasnt any point to that at all, just a recapitulation of a common pont of view.
I used to play the cello, it has been a few years though. I'm in the camp that casts trance as being nowhere close to classical. I think there is a compositional element to what we do, but it doesnt compare to classical, things in trance are thought of in terms of gimmicks, in the context of being played in a DJ mix so it must by default be somewhat similar to the other stuff that the DJ is playing, too much contrast sounds random, too much structure sounds boring.
To me trance doesn't seem to pride itself on exploring new sounds that much, just making people dance. The target demographic for classical and trance are way different, classical being uppder class, educated and rich types, trance is a lower middle class thing, there is no high culture in trance like there was in classical. This music is much more of a commodity, and nobody is getting commisioned to make it as some form of art, its just fun loops to dance to, much more simple and silly, not some serious prestigous elite thing.
Last edited by Zombie0915 on Mar-30-2006 at 15:47
|