 |
|
|
|
 |
Pjotr G
Mindcrawler

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Netherlands
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by IDarkISwordI
Btw, a vocoder is a special type of comb filter, and if the comb filter you were using is advanced enough, then that could be substituted.
|
Que?
A comb filter puts mixes the signal with a slightly delayed version, so that phase cancellation occurs. It's the same technique as a flanger, but the flanger adds the factor of the comb filter opening up and closing down with an LFO.
A vocoder is something entirely different. It analyses a "modulator" signal in the following way: the signal is divided up into a defined number of bands (i.e. 16 or 32 or w/e), and for each band the volume envelope is passed on to a "carrier" signal, divided into an equal amount of bands. The modulator is typically a vocal, and the carrier a synth, though this is not necessary. The signal you ultimately hear is the carrier, but with some of the frequency responses of the modulator applied to it as described.
___________________
All rhythm evolves around a kick...
|
|
Apr-06-2006 07:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
IDarkISwordI
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Clay Center, USA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Pjotr G
Que?
A comb filter puts mixes the signal with a slightly delayed version, so that phase cancellation occurs. It's the same technique as a flanger, but the flanger adds the factor of the comb filter opening up and closing down with an LFO. |
Wrong. A comb filter, aka formant filter (just more flexible), is a huge bank of bandpass filters. The reason it is called a comb filter is because setting these bandpass regions, on a spectral display, it will look like you ran a comb through it. What you were describing sounds more like a phaser.
Cheers,
Zac
[EDIT:] Wikipedia gives almost the exact same thing as you however, the difference being is they dont go into further depth of how one really interfaces in the music world. I suppose at the very basic level, that is what happens though.
___________________
DarkSword - Turn On
DarkSword - Hell Bound
DarkSword - Fresh
DarkSword - Styled
DarkSword - Shadowed Sun
DarkSword - Turning Forward
DarkSword - ALLFRUIT
Pacific Mint vs DarkSword - Climax Zone 2005
SoundClick Page
 
---FL Studio 9 User---
Last edited by IDarkISwordI on Apr-06-2006 at 17:30
|
|
Apr-06-2006 17:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
thoughtlessjex
Yakkity Yak

Registered: May 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by IDarkISwordI
Wrong. A comb filter, aka formant filter (just more flexible), is a huge bank of bandpass filters. The reason it is called a comb filter is because setting these bandpass regions, on a spectral display, it will look like you ran a comb through it. What you were describing sounds more like a phaser. |
A comb filter is not a bank of bandpass filters, it is a bank of bandreject/notch filters. This same effect is acheived by a flanger, which is why they are synonyms.
It is also not a formant filter, which is really just an EQ that is set to emulate the resonance curves of formants, or the vowel sounds of the human mouth. (Fun Fact: Your mouth is one big, sometimes stinky, EQ. Have some Altoids.)
A phaser is in fact also a comb filter. The difference between a phaser and a flanger being that you can control each "tine" separately, and can create irregularly spaced "tines" as a result.
___________________

www.jexmusic.com - My website
|
|
Apr-06-2006 21:50
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:51.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|