 |
|
|
|
 |
Yoepus
Neo-condimist

Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
Condoning and endorsing non-combatant casualties as being part of the price of war is a disgusting concept anyone could warrant. To be honest anyone that would even come close to this thought process has to have some mental flaws. |
Its not condoning or endorising non-combatant casualties as b eing a part of the price of war. Its realizing humans are humans and murder is murder, and murder will happen and has happened since the story of Cain and Abel....
The argument isn't this is the price of war, the argument is, you got a bunch of your not most clever folks (mostly university uneducated, poor, immigrants, and so forth who couldn't find another way to pay for college or a less risky career path (this is not to categorize all like this of course, but you have these)), and therefore you see the same problem in Iraq with those type of people as you see in the USA just expressed in a different manner.
Guys who kill there girlfriends who cheated on them are no more or less likely to kill Iraqis connect or not connect to a death of one of their closes buddies.
You see the trend?
Instead of another killing here in our streets over some trivial "personal fued" or what not, we export the same source that would over react in the USA to Iraq.
I guess the only real winners out of this are the cheatting girlfriends.

___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!
Click here to support the free mustard alliance.
|
|
Jun-01-2006 03:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
Renegade
____________/

Registered: May 2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
okay. you've made it clear. you are not interested in context. murder is murder. my guess would be Renegade isn't either.
...and no matter where you stand at any given moment about any given murder, the wanton killing of civilians by the U.S. military has been and will always remain an anomaly of it's conduct.
(i'm paraphrasing someone btw) |
I'm interested in context, but the fact is that in this case - as with most others - the context just doesn't really alter the severity the situation. 24 innocent people were slaughtered without just cause and I'm not sure what pertinence, if any, the conduct of the marines prior to this incident has to the case at hand. I'm willing to believe that the marines involved are normally great guys and that their actions were completely out of character, but to what extent does this mitigate what they did? I'm sure that you could find excuses for most criminals if you were willing to accomodate "context" and "prior behaviour" into your judgement of them - but where would that leave us? At what point can we admit that people, regardless of their "context", are ultimately responsible - in both a moral and a legal sense - for the actions they perform?
| quote: | Originally posted by Yoepus
Its not condoning or endorising non-combatant casualties as b eing a part of the price of war. Its realizing humans are humans and murder is murder, and murder will happen and has happened since the story of Cain and Abel.... |
Naturally, but I'm not sure what your angle is here. Murder may well be an inexorable facet of human nature, but does that make it any less worthy of condemnation? Is a murder in a place where murder is common any better than a murder in a place where it isn't?
___________________
http://eschatonnow.blogspot.com/
|
|
Jun-01-2006 16:19
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|