|
| quote: | Originally posted by Kapedan
+1, Ill agree with you here, but I dont think we should give them the right to adoption, and the right to call it marrige. Maybe something else, but not marrige.
Also, I doubt most republicans are againts it because reduces population. Its more about moral issues. |
Marriage = The LEGAL union of a couple. The only people who care about this are the religious people, and I hate to tell them, but marriage wasn't started by the Bible. It's not a religious union, it's a legal union. You don't have to be religious to get married. I can go down to the courthouse and get a judge to marry me to a woman. For that reason, maybe the Christians should find a new word for their union between a man and a woman.
Seriously, how many non-religious people do you know of that care whether gays marry. It's just another way that the religious people are trying to legislate their religious views. Religion isn't supposed to sponsored by our government and this is just another example of them not abiding by that founding principle.
Also, why is it moral to discriminate against people legally because of their sexual preferrence? Why shouldn't they be able to adopt. At least the kid is being raised by TWO people? We allow single people to adopt. Are children better off in orphanages than in homes with two men or two women? You've got to be kidding me.
___________________
"Go back to bed america your government is in control
Here's American Gladiators, here is 56 channels of it,
Watch these picturary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom,
Here you go America you are free to do as we tell you
We want your soul
Your cash, your house, your phone, your cash, your house, your life" -Adam Freeland - We Want Your Soul
|