|
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
"My boy", if you actually read what I said you'll notice I didn't say anything about progression.
Simply put - you cannot compare trance with classical since they don't really have anything in common.
...or do I still need to dumb it down for you? |
Wow, what a wretched disposition you have! Mercy please, spare me your MrMysteryDegrading sense of sudden and baseless defensiveness!
Obviously you should read my original post, in which I said that trance is the 21st century equivalent of classical.
Or do I need to dumb it down for you and draw comparisons, such as emphasis on melody, or the fact that trance is mostly for dancing to, and classical was mostly a theatrical outing, the length of both art forms, or the nature of both trance and classical having all elements composed mostly by a single person?
Be careful in the future about being a nasty shit when you don't even know what you're trying to start an argument about! 
|