 |
|
|
|
 |
Drik
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Boras, Sweden
|
|
|
I have a couple of buses setup for different eq settings fx etc. Everything is basically already finished from get go in a template that I have created for my gear, so basically I start the music idea, route the different elements to different buses, then when Im finished with the arrangement I do the last eq tweaks and fx tweaks so that it all mixes well.
Basically, it's worth setting up a template for your kind of sound, so you can concentrate on the arrangement instead of worrying on drums sounding fat enough. Also, decide which drums you are going to use, don't change between different tracks. Then save those drums with your template with a couple of midi tracks setup for them. That way you have percussion ready too. Try getting the tedious parts done in a template so that you can get going faster, that way you don't loose any creativity 
___________________
E-Mortal/Fredrik Johansson www.emortal.se
www.myspace.com/fredrikemortal
Upcoming/Latest releases:
Jan Johnston - Let the world fall apart (E:mortal remix) - Metallic Recordings
Headstrong ft. Tiff Lacey - The Truth (E:mortal remix) - SOLA
E:mortal - Lost Planet - Ministry of Sound & BTR, E:mortal ft. Tiff Lacey - Tell me - SOLA
E:mortal ft. Tiff Lacey - Footprints - SOLA, E:mortal ft. Tiff Lacey - Coming Home - SOLA
E:mortal ft. Vicky Fee - Say What You Feel - SOLA, E:mortal - Days On End - BTR
Headstrong ft. Kirsty Hawkshaw - In in Your Eyes (E:mortal remix)- SOLA
|
|
Jun-12-2006 15:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
Four_On_Four-er
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: (Red Wing, USA) & DEEp underground where it's still warm...
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Diginerd
Sorry Guys I hate to do this but I strongly disagree.
Writing and structuring is very much a "Right brain" process. Mixing is very much more of a "Left Brain" process. That alone is enough to tie me up in knots if I try and do both at the same time.
|
This sounds very logical... it's a good hypothesis for my many periods of unfinished loop-projects.
It would seem that I spend alot more time at a piano thinking of my ideas anymore. If that works, I'll try to incorperate my melodies and moods onto synths, but often I'll end up focusing on the wrong tasks.
___________________
Audio-s
|
|
Jun-13-2006 05:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
Diginerd
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Stamford, CT, USA but from the UK
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Shibby
+1
Perhaps the suggestion to mix after arranging was given by someone in a different era?
In 2006, if you buy a new PC, you can even MASTER while arranging! |
It's an old (if you count old as around 60 years) philosophy, but still very valid. Think how many people used to be involved in the production of a record. Now it's usually just one person when producing "Electronica"...
I hate that term by the way, but it does cover an entire spectrum of music, not just trance.
There are two main approaches to working in this area.
Since you're a one man band, do you act like this:-
And try and do averything at once...
Badly.
Or do you plan ahead, use some real talent and focus on each part / task separately and deliver a solid performance.
yes, he played everything himself recorded and mixed most of his output too accross multiple albums. Many without a computer, but when sequencing became viable he embraced it.
He didn't master any of it though..
If you want to hear what a serious musician does, listen to Tubular Bells, (Recorded on a 4 track, in the seventies, when he was 17), then to hear what impact a producer can make listen to Tubular Bells 2. Trevor Horn's sonic signature is all over it, even if you don't like what he does you have to admire it technically.
Finally Tubular Bells 2003 is a rerecording of the original Seventies record, again solo, but this time with state of the art technology.
That said, we will not speak of Tubular Bells 3, as it is heretic and should be burned from everyone's mind..
Anyway..
Same artist, essentially the same piece of music, 30 year span.
Finally, if one more person tells me you can master when you're mixing I think I'm going to puke. If you really understand what mastering is then you wouldn't dream of saying things like that...
Sorry, a little flamey but really understand what you are saying before shooting your mouth off about Super Duper 2006 PC technology being better than the last 40-50 years of recording wisdom, and certainly the last 30 years of how to successfully put together multi-million selling records on your own.
Engage Brain before opening mouth (Our typing merrilly)
|
|
Jun-13-2006 12:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
Diginerd
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Stamford, CT, USA but from the UK
|
|
|
Just to clarify, what got my goat was the mastering comment..
Either aproach can work, it's just the logical planned method has a far better track record..
|
|
Jun-13-2006 12:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJSentinel
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: May 2006
Location:
|
|
|
All that matters is the product, so if the product sounds good, who give a flying fck what you did or how you did it or what you did it with.
Just my 0.02
Pce,
DJS
___________________
MYSPACE
http://www.myspace.com/djsentinelmusic
|
|
Jun-13-2006 18:48
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|