well cdjs are nice, i havent gotten mine yet (2 more weeks!!!) but if you have a pair of pio 1000's for example, you get the best of both worlds, effects and looping and vinyl mode as well which you can then couple with ssl or FS if thats what you dig...to be honest its just about personal preference i dont think anyone here can make a decision for you, but it looks like you've already decided in the direction you want to go..what kinda decks do you have?? i mean if your havin fun using your computer in conjunction with vinyl then that's great, all the power to you...but perhaps you should go play around with some nice cdj's in a music shop to get a better understanding and make your decision. good luck bro

quote:

Originally posted by SPAWNmaster well cdjs are nice, i havent gotten mine yet (2 more weeks!!!) but if you have a pair of pio 1000's for example, you get the best of both worlds, effects and looping and vinyl mode as well which you can then couple with ssl or FS if thats what you dig...to be honest its just about personal preference i dont think anyone here can make a decision for you, but it looks like you've already decided in the direction you want to go..what kinda decks do you have?? i mean if your havin fun using your computer in conjunction with vinyl then that's great, all the power to you...but perhaps you should go play around with some nice cdj's in a music shop to get a better understanding and make your decision. good luck bro

Thanks for the advice!

To answer your question, I do not currently have decks at all. I haven't purchased them yet. But it's the route I plan on going, since with Final Scratch I have the musical flexibility (and more) of the CDJ with the tactile features of vinyl. But it seems that a lot of people use CDJs instead, so I thought I would see why that is.

As you said, I'm sure it just comes down to preference.

edit-- FYI, I currently DJ using Traktor (without Final Scratch) and my MIDI controller, with the crossfader mapped to one of my sliders, and the EQs assigned to my knobs, etc.)

Also that fact that if you wanted to play MP3/WAVs on your TTs with SSL or Final Scratch, you have to turn your computer on. With CDJs, you can just play around with them and listen to your MP3s/WAV without having to turn on your computer in order to do so. It comes in handy to have a laptop with SSL or FS so you can use that, but not everyone has a laptop, or enough space to fit a laptop and two TTs, since TTs are bigger than CDJs. Also taking a laptop to gigs is okay but you have to be really careful not to get it damaged or stolen. Quite a big investment. CDs are a hell of a lot cheaper to replace than a laptop.

Q: What can you do on a CDJ that you can't do in Serato or Final Scratch?


A: Play CDs

Technically you could put a CD in the disc drive of the computer you're using Serato or FS on and 'play CDs'.

___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.

Latest Mix

quote:

Originally posted by spike_boy69 Q: What can you do on a CDJ that you can't do in Serato or Final Scratch? A: Play CDs

I don't know about final scratch, but Serato is compatable with both cdj's or tables, so if you wanted to you could use cdj's to control serato, and still play cd's if you wanted to.


A;;em

I prefer looping in Traktor with FS2 much more than on cdjs... But in terms of convinience, CDJs rule all. All clubs have cdjs, many more now only have cdjs rather than turntables- This for me is the huge draw.

___________________
Fortuna Favet Fortibus.

I am currently sitting on this exact dilema.

Vinyl woes that don't happen with CDJ's
Dust - I hate any dust issues getting under the needles/stylus. Pisses me off to no end.

Buffer - Stability. If you have big bass in a club, an annoying fan bouncing around beside an unstable booth, you're going to suffer skipping.

Instant looping - I know with FS2 that looping is available, but it's more hands on instead of 'click-on' with FS and SSL. You have more control, and it's much more effective.

My biggest option to switch to CDJ's

FS2 and SSL is a major pain in the ass to setup in a club. I like to just get up and go instead of getting behind the mixer and fucking around. Such a pain when you're working with a Xone 464 as you have to climb UNDER the damn DJ booth/mixer to connect things. The idea of FS is great and I've been using it for years. But the practicality in a club is very difficult because it is not club standard and we're not all PvD having a team of people set it up for you.

For the record, I've never had a single issue for computer problems with Final Scratch, both 1 and 2.

___________________
djchrisallen.net | myspace | ava recordings | facebook | facebook fan page | twitter

Whatever you decide on DONT GET FINAL SCRATCH. You'll regret it. Trust me FS is known for poor tech support. I've been there. I had so many issues, that I finally gave up on it and bought Serato. Man, I LOVE SERATO. Vinyl emulation is so close to the real thing. I LOVE IT!

With Version 1.5 and 1.6 you can now do loops, and hot cues. On other words, you can have up to 9 (I think) loops saved per track and 5 hot cues. You can't do that with a CDJ. Practically everything you can do with a CDJ and turntable you can do with Serato. Its so freakin stable, I never had an issue with it. Tech support is awesome, and the peeps on their message board are real helpful. SoCal Serato board members have monthly Serato Spin Offs & meetings where we all get together spin off, share ideas, help each other out, and show tricks, and talk about what's hot on the dancefloor right now. All the DJs play different styles, so when someone needs help with EDM, I help them out, when someone needs help with hip hop, others help out. It's like a close family.


Check it out, this is from the last Serato Meetup on June.

___________________
EDM is not a trend, it's a lifestyle. You either get it or you don't.

I think the huge advantage Serato or FS has is that they use a computer. The big downside is that in a club environment setup and keeping everything safe can get tricky. This is nothing a little preparation and professionalism can't over come. Talk to promoters and techs before hand and let them know what you need and want to do. Not only will this make things allot easier it will make you look good. Showing you’re serious about having a good performance and are doing the necessary preparation to ensure it. Incorporating a computer into your tools can give you limitless possibilities compared to other setups. I've seen Sasha and BT live and was blow away by the performance. I know these guys weren’t using Serato, or FS. The point I’m makeing is its not just Serato or FS that are better than CDJ's. Its the addition of a computer to the mix that will give you so much more that you could do.


Allen

Personally I would recommend CDJs over FS2 and SSL, but if you're going to use a vinyl emulator...I would go with Serato.

Yes, it can be a pain in the ass to set up.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Dirk W. People in Dallas aren't *ssholes. Just look at me, I live in Dallas.

Meat is Murder...tasty, tasty murder.

quote:

Originally posted by Allen Mueller I think the huge advantage Serato or FS has is that they use a computer. The big downside is that in a club environment setup and keeping everything safe can get tricky. This is nothing a little preparation and professionalism can't over come. Talk to promoters and techs before hand and let them know what you need and want to do. Not only will this make things allot easier it will make you look good. Showing you’re serious about having a good performance and are doing the necessary preparation to ensure it. Incorporating a computer into your tools can give you limitless possibilities compared to other setups. I've seen Sasha and BT live and was blow away by the performance. I know these guys weren’t using Serato, or FS. The point I’m makeing is its not just Serato or FS that are better than CDJ's. Its the addition of a computer to the mix that will give you so much more that you could do. Allen

First off, while I agree that in theory it may be valuable to add a computer to the mix because of the potential in extra techniques (effects, live re-sequencing etc), hardly anyone would see those kinds of benefits. This guy in particular is looking to buy his first DJ setup and may not have any experience with production, so I doubt he'll benefit from having a computer that does anything beyond FS or Serato.

Second, promotors are notorious for not coming through with shit so relying on them to do something as (to them) menial as figuring out how you're going to hook up your cables, is probably a bad idea.

Personally, the reasons I went with CDJs instead of Serato are that I didn't want to bother with setting up all the cabling outside of my bedroom, and that I didn't want to rely on my laptop not to fuck up during a set (which I've seen happen). Note that I already had turntables and a laptop so that wasn't an issue.

___________________
"I played 12.30 til close at 3am at the club (Antro), following on from an Australian dj,
which seemed unusual in deepest Texas." - Judge Jules