Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I generally burn my audio CD's at 32x to be sure, but in the past few months all I can make is skippy cd's (even burning at 2x) anyone else had this issue with a Pioneer DVR-108?
Aug-16-2006 08:24
Protege
Just like perfection
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: East Bay
I dont even know what I burn at, whatever the default setting is I guess. Ive never had any skipping problems though.
Aug-16-2006 14:03
OTtrancer
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Ottawa
Guys, this might be off topic....but I've recently started with cd's/cdj's, and I'd like to know what you guys recommend in regards to how many tracks you put on a cd. I'm finding it tough to sift through my cd's to find a certain track that I want. Vinyl was easy because you could see the front of the sleeve and know what tune it was. I've been putting as many songs as I can, I haven't been putting new with new, older with older, and I'm spending way too much time looking through my binder I think. What's your guys best mechanism for organizing your binder and amount of tracks??? I'm sure if I get these two aspects covered, I'll be much better off. Thanks in advance!
Aug-16-2006 14:32
Protege
Just like perfection
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: East Bay
quote:
Originally posted by OTtrancer
Guys, this might be off topic....but I've recently started with cd's/cdj's, and I'd like to know what you guys recommend in regards to how many tracks you put on a cd. I'm finding it tough to sift through my cd's to find a certain track that I want. Vinyl was easy because you could see the front of the sleeve and know what tune it was. I've been putting as many songs as I can, I haven't been putting new with new, older with older, and I'm spending way too much time looking through my binder I think. What's your guys best mechanism for organizing your binder and amount of tracks??? I'm sure if I get these two aspects covered, I'll be much better off. Thanks in advance!
Some people put one track per cd (a big waste imo) and some put 8-10 per cd. I probable average about 7-8 or so per cd. It seems to work pretty good for me so far. Just try it out to see what works best for your style.
Aug-16-2006 14:51
OTtrancer
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Ottawa
quote:
Originally posted by Protege
Some people put one track per cd (a big waste imo) and some put 8-10 per cd. I probable average about 7-8 or so per cd. It seems to work pretty good for me so far. Just try it out to see what works best for your style.
That is what I do now too....do you mix old with new on your discs, Or do you have discs that contain only newer stuff and ones with old. Since I just started burnin cd's, I figured I would have a mix of stuff on each cd, and I think that's where I went wrong. Might be best to burn a bunch of new, and then a bunch of older stuff for when you want to dig up a classic. I guess basically my question now is...what order are your cd's in your binder? Are you always able to quickly find a track that you want?
Aug-16-2006 14:59
nchs09
Traceaddict in training
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Inside your mum
quote:
Originally posted by OTtrancer
Guys, this might be off topic....but I've recently started with cd's/cdj's, and I'd like to know what you guys recommend in regards to how many tracks you put on a cd. I'm finding it tough to sift through my cd's to find a certain track that I want. Vinyl was easy because you could see the front of the sleeve and know what tune it was. I've been putting as many songs as I can, I haven't been putting new with new, older with older, and I'm spending way too much time looking through my binder I think. What's your guys best mechanism for organizing your binder and amount of tracks??? I'm sure if I get these two aspects covered, I'll be much better off. Thanks in advance!
i do 2 tracks per cd
example
1- Tiesto Traffic
2 - Tiesto - trainwreck
or i do 3 tracks but of the same song
example
1 Tiesto - Superfreak
1)James brown remix
2)Jesus remix
3)2bpm remix.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
OOKA-OOKA ME NACHOS ME PRESS KEYS ON COMPUTER GOOD
Aug-16-2006 15:18
Zild
Ten City
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio, US : TXTA #156
quote:
Originally posted by skip
i always burn as slow as possible. what's the rush?
You'll see what the rush it when your friend calls says he's picking you up after he gets off work in a few hours and you have a gig to play but you just found out and he says there is no way to hook up SSL so you'd have to use CDs but they have CDJ1000s.
Get to burning!
___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.
I use a pioneer burner, i burn at 32x using Nero 7, ALWAYS 80 minutes worth of tracks (sometimes 10, 12, 16 or maybe even 6 tracks but always 80 minutes) i have a pair of CDJ-1000s and i use Sony CD-Rs exclusively.
Out of about 100 CDs (not counting any other use besides music) i have never, ever had one skip during a set, or anything. Hope this helps a little bit
Originally posted by OTtrancer
That is what I do now too....do you mix old with new on your discs, Or do you have discs that contain only newer stuff and ones with old. Since I just started burnin cd's, I figured I would have a mix of stuff on each cd, and I think that's where I went wrong. Might be best to burn a bunch of new, and then a bunch of older stuff for when you want to dig up a classic. I guess basically my question now is...what order are your cd's in your binder? Are you always able to quickly find a track that you want?
when I first started I just burned them alphabetically cause I have them in one big folder. So I have a lot of my older stuff already burned. So now anything new I get, I just burn it and add it to the end of my cd case so that the newest stuff is in the back and the old stuff is in the front. make sense?
Aug-16-2006 18:05
Nemesis44
ZZZZZzzzzzz.....
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton
The burn speed is important for the following reason.
The faster you burn the CD the more shallow the data will be written. Basically at lower speeds the data is burnt much deeper, meaning that the CD is harder to damage.
In terms of audio there shouldn't be any difference it's purely to do with the longgevity (in some cases compatability).
Another not so known fact is that CDs are just as sensitive to damage on the top as the read surface if not more so...
I used Sony CD's until last week I burnt 13 CD's i needed for a gig only to find an hour beforehand that all the CD's wouldn't play in my CDJ1000 or CDJ800.
A faulty batch.
Now its TDK all the way...
Aug-18-2006 13:37
djkoolaide
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2004
Location:
I use Audition to decode to WAV, and then I burn at 4x. It's always failsafe!