Originally posted by Groundhog Boy
I voted for Halliwell last year, but I just haven't seen/heard enough of him to vote for him again this year. He needs to come to NYC more often. I think the last time was following B&J @ Avalon in July 2005.
yep and that was a hell of a show!
___________________
Sep-05-2006 23:56
chimera66
PARTOUZE
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Left Coast
quote:
1.Eddie halliwell
2.Sander van doorn
3.Serge deviant
4.Blake jarrell
5.Richard Durant
classy move
Sep-06-2006 03:52
BiG MiKE
:-|
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: LINY
quote:
Originally posted by djinnom
This is a crock. He knows he won't win this year so he's setting himself up to look like a saint and not a chump for losing. so now, when he loses this year, he has an excuse as to why.
I was waiting for someone to make a comment like that
But the people he put up in his top 5 was a pretty good move. And to even solidify that, he put it on the homepage of his website.
Originally posted by djinnom
This is a crock. He knows he won't win this year so he's setting himself up to look like a saint and not a chump for losing. so now, when he loses this year, he has an excuse as to why.
sure it is...
tiesto has for months been saying this exact thing privately, before this year's voting even began.
i just tip my hat to the guy for doing something like this (the djs he supported aren't even his labelmates, just guys he likes a lot -- he's praised eddie halliwell and svd in the past, and he def. likes serge since he requests him as his opener/closer all the time).
Never voted for Tiesto so he wont be loosing or gaining mine. Halliwell is pretty good but I wouldnt vote him as number one. I agree there hasnt been many 2006 sets from him.
Las time i heard that man speak, he was saying how Holden owned his world.
___________________
"I think the scientific and the artistic spirit have something in common. The scientist wants not only to learn the facts, but to understand how they cohere, fit together and make a whole. He even uses criteria such as beauty and symmetry to help decide which theory he wants.
The scientist cannot capture the whole cosmos in thought. In his mind he makes a kind of microcosm, which we see as an analogue of the cosmos. In this way we try to get a feeling for the whole. The artist, I suppose, gets a feeling for the whole some other way.”
David Bohm in “Art, Dialogue and the Implicate Order”, published in On Creativity RC (Routledge Classics)
