Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > i need help seperating string from lead synth
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
thoughtlessjex
Yakkity Yak



Registered: May 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Having tried this on a bass and kick combination, I agree with Diginut. It's better to just EQ out the conflicts while trying to maintain the fuller sound. As Diginut said, mixing is a compromise, and this abuse of sidechaining is a cop-out.


___________________

www.jexmusic.com - My website

Old Post Oct-08-2006 15:24  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for thoughtlessjex Click here to Send thoughtlessjex a Private Message Add thoughtlessjex to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ Shibby
Amphoteric Superbase



Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Of Earthzen and the Therethen

quote:
Originally posted by mysticalninja
it might not be perceptivly weaker.


Correct.

It's all about tailoring the illusion of the sound to the perception of the listener.

Depending on the track and the instrument, you may use EQ and/or sidechaining, or neither.

In this case, it sounds like the guy needs to EQ his pad or his lead, though, to make both fit tightly together, since he basically let us know that his track elements were conflicting.

Old Post Oct-08-2006 18:19  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ Shibby Click here to Send DJ Shibby a Private Message Visit DJ Shibby's homepage! Add DJ Shibby to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
mysticalninja
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles

Erm I didn't mean to make it sound like I don't ever use subtractive EQ because I think it makes sounds weaker, infact it's the number one tool I use in production.

quote:
Having tried this on a bass and kick combination, I agree with Diginut. It's better to just EQ out the conflicts while trying to maintain the fuller sound. As Diginut said, mixing is a compromise, and this abuse of sidechaining is a cop-out.


You tried sidechaining a Kick/Bass once, couldn't get it right, and now you consider sidechaining a cop-out? Cool. Was there even a bass note hitting with the kick? I've seen people try to put a sidechain on an OFFBEAT bass because the kick had a long tail, and then wonder why it doesn't sound right..


___________________


https://soundcloud.com/ghostea stuff

Old Post Oct-08-2006 21:41  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for mysticalninja Click here to Send mysticalninja a Private Message Add mysticalninja to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe

EQ isn't used in a vacuum, it's done along with proper levels.

You might cut out certain frequencies and then raise the volume to compensate. Or not. The point is, conflicting sounds will all get buried and appear to be weak, whereas proper EQ will bring them all out and they will all sound stronger, in spite of having smaller bandwidths. Ducking, on the other hand, is simply going to bury one sound in favour of the other, which is why it's a great technique for managing reverb and other wet effects but generally a lousy technique for balancing elements of a mix.

You are right about one thing though MN: ducking is not a replacement for EQ, which is precisely why I'm saying that it shouldn't be used as one.

I guess the saying is true, a broken watch is right twice a day.

Most mixes I've heard that I would consider to be professional do not use the ducked/sidechained sound. Some do, but most not, and the vast majority of ones that do, use it to balance wet effects and not to create a pumping sound.


___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

Old Post Oct-09-2006 01:35  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for DigiNut Click here to Send DigiNut a Private Message Add DigiNut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
mysticalninja
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles

I mostly listen to house / prog tho.


___________________


https://soundcloud.com/ghostea stuff

Old Post Oct-09-2006 03:07  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for mysticalninja Click here to Send mysticalninja a Private Message Add mysticalninja to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
thoughtlessjex
Yakkity Yak



Registered: May 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina

quote:
Originally posted by mysticalninja
You tried sidechaining a Kick/Bass once, couldn't get it right, and now you consider sidechaining a cop-out? Cool. Was there even a bass note hitting with the kick? I've seen people try to put a sidechain on an OFFBEAT bass because the kick had a long tail, and then wonder why it doesn't sound right..

Fuck you, too. This was a rolling bassline. I gated the kick, too. I just couldn't hear the fucking bassline when the two hit together. Thanks for being a dickhead.


___________________

www.jexmusic.com - My website

Old Post Oct-09-2006 05:00  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for thoughtlessjex Click here to Send thoughtlessjex a Private Message Add thoughtlessjex to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
mysticalninja
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles

Lmfao sory.. Try a lower theshold, with high limiting like ratio. with rolling bass u dont wnat that much ducking try around -20 -30 max.


___________________


https://soundcloud.com/ghostea stuff

Old Post Oct-09-2006 07:21  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for mysticalninja Click here to Send mysticalninja a Private Message Add mysticalninja to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
zodiac9
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX

If one decides that EQing is the way to go, to get the pad and lead to not clash, what steps do you take to figure out how each one should then be EQed? How do you figure out what frequencies should be cut or boosted in each? I know how to give a little boost to an instrument to bring it out more, but EQing 2 instruments to get them to not clash seems trickier. Seems to me you would EQ only one of the instruments, not both, perhaps the pad.

A lot of the time my pads seem to not be as clearly heard as I want them to be, even when they aren't clashing with any of the other instruments. I've run into this lately, and it's a bit frustrating.


___________________
soundcloud

Youtube

Old Post Oct-10-2006 23:20  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for zodiac9 Click here to Send zodiac9 a Private Message Visit zodiac9's homepage! Add zodiac9 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe

quote:
Originally posted by zodiac9
If one decides that EQing is the way to go, to get the pad and lead to not clash, what steps do you take to figure out how each one should then be EQed? How do you figure out what frequencies should be cut or boosted in each? I know how to give a little boost to an instrument to bring it out more, but EQing 2 instruments to get them to not clash seems trickier. Seems to me you would EQ only one of the instruments, not both, perhaps the pad.

A lot of the time my pads seem to not be as clearly heard as I want them to be, even when they aren't clashing with any of the other instruments. I've run into this lately, and it's a bit frustrating.

That's often correct - you might only need to EQ one of them. Sometimes you'll cut one, boost the other... sometimes cut both... sometimes cut both in some spots and boost both in other spots. Really it's kind of a trial-and-error process unless you've got years of experience behind you.

As for pads, you have to be careful with those; as producers we all like to hear all the sounds we put into the track, but to a listener pads are just atmosphere, background noise. They really shouldn't stand out that much, and we producers have to be careful not to fall into the trap of trying to bring out the background elements too much.


___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

Old Post Oct-10-2006 23:58  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for DigiNut Click here to Send DigiNut a Private Message Add DigiNut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
thoughtlessjex
Yakkity Yak



Registered: May 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, North Carolina

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
As for pads, you have to be careful with those; as producers we all like to hear all the sounds we put into the track, but to a listener pads are just atmosphere, background noise. They really shouldn't stand out that much, and we producers have to be careful not to fall into the trap of trying to bring out the background elements too much.

For this reason, I often don't even give my pads much presence in the treble range. I think pads sound better when lowpassed, anyway.


___________________

www.jexmusic.com - My website

Old Post Oct-11-2006 00:40  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for thoughtlessjex Click here to Send thoughtlessjex a Private Message Add thoughtlessjex to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Effero
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Canada

Dynamically attenuating a specific part of a frequency has been done long time before Benny (he just took it to the extreme, which will probably sound funny in a couple of years). Deessers, that serve this function (although usually used on vocals) have been on the market for a long time and used quite extensively.
But, who says you can't attenuate a frequency of your choice on a lead. If it sounds good, it's good...
Cheers
Effero


___________________

Old Post Oct-11-2006 18:10  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Effero Click here to Send Effero a Private Message Add Effero to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > i need help seperating string from lead synth
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): « 1 [2]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackTrance Generators Style Tune ID [2003] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackOxygen feat. Andrea Britton - "On Your Mind" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 18:57.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!