 |
|
|
|
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
EQ isn't used in a vacuum, it's done along with proper levels.
You might cut out certain frequencies and then raise the volume to compensate. Or not. The point is, conflicting sounds will all get buried and appear to be weak, whereas proper EQ will bring them all out and they will all sound stronger, in spite of having smaller bandwidths. Ducking, on the other hand, is simply going to bury one sound in favour of the other, which is why it's a great technique for managing reverb and other wet effects but generally a lousy technique for balancing elements of a mix.
You are right about one thing though MN: ducking is not a replacement for EQ, which is precisely why I'm saying that it shouldn't be used as one.
I guess the saying is true, a broken watch is right twice a day.
Most mixes I've heard that I would consider to be professional do not use the ducked/sidechained sound. Some do, but most not, and the vast majority of ones that do, use it to balance wet effects and not to create a pumping sound.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
Oct-09-2006 01:35
|
|
|
 |
 |
mysticalninja
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
|
|
|
Oct-09-2006 03:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by zodiac9
If one decides that EQing is the way to go, to get the pad and lead to not clash, what steps do you take to figure out how each one should then be EQed? How do you figure out what frequencies should be cut or boosted in each? I know how to give a little boost to an instrument to bring it out more, but EQing 2 instruments to get them to not clash seems trickier. Seems to me you would EQ only one of the instruments, not both, perhaps the pad.
A lot of the time my pads seem to not be as clearly heard as I want them to be, even when they aren't clashing with any of the other instruments. I've run into this lately, and it's a bit frustrating. |
That's often correct - you might only need to EQ one of them. Sometimes you'll cut one, boost the other... sometimes cut both... sometimes cut both in some spots and boost both in other spots. Really it's kind of a trial-and-error process unless you've got years of experience behind you.
As for pads, you have to be careful with those; as producers we all like to hear all the sounds we put into the track, but to a listener pads are just atmosphere, background noise. They really shouldn't stand out that much, and we producers have to be careful not to fall into the trap of trying to bring out the background elements too much.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
Oct-10-2006 23:58
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:57.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|