quote:

Originally posted by RJT Indeed, and the noticeably hurried Katamari PSP only further hurt the franchise.

I remember playing it at GDC last year. What a blemish it's left.

::quickly shuffled over to the Loco Roco and Daxter booths::

Speaking of which, Loco Roco is pretty innovative, no?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN serious LOL at an 18yo thinking he knows shit about gaming

You don't have to know shit about gaming to enjoy a game and express an opinion.

quote:

Originally posted by Yan Speaking of which, Loco Roco is pretty innovative, no?

Indeed - All too unfortunate that the majority of these games get incredibly small market shares.

___________________
last minute disco dot net

yea it was kind of embarrassing the other week when i was at my buddy's house playing playstation with his girlfriend's 4 year son, and he kept grabbing my remote control and saying, "NO! that's not how you do it! gimme it"


that little ****** kept cheating too.


old school video games FTW!

i like tekken 2 from the first play station. that's about as modern as i got. lol

___________________

My soliloquy may be hard for some to swallow, but so is cod liver oil.

quote:

Originally posted by notelfreak man i can't believe i tried to come off as responsible in that other thread, i am so full of shit just don't tell anyone

real gaming for me started with novalogics delta force pc game.
went online, started playing with a bunch of newbs.
us bunch of newbs developed skills and organized.
we learned to communicate via voice-over-net programs.
nova has expanded their original df series to df2, df3.
later the developed bhd, and finally joint-ops, and dfx.
i dont know what my point is, just fucking eat it.

___________________


http://www.cev3.com/

what everyone seems to be missing, is that the video game industry is a good 30 years old. there is only so much you can do in the realm of "innovation" as you've got 30 years of games that have done "it" before.

there isnt an infinite amount of innovation that can be made. it has plateud, as have graphics to a lesser extent. you cant keep on improving each and every title. im really not sure what youre expecting. especially since the original gamers like myself are getting on in years and dont have the time like we used to, so now games are being designed for every 15yo whose parent has bought them a 360.

still, if youre willing to play some of the lesser known games, you can still find innovative titles out there.

oh, and doom3 was a superb title insofar as it succeeded at everything it tried to do. it was a remake of the original doom series after all, it wasnt there to be innovative, it was there to be immersive, and myself and a whole lot of other people were scared shitless by that game.

quote:

Originally posted by jupiterone You don't have to know shit about gaming to enjoy a game and express an opinion.

of course you dont. but i always try to have an idea about something im going to express my opinion about. theres a reason why punks like you dont work for the likes of IGN.

___________________

Delta Force 2 was great. Came with that microphone too

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN oh, and doom3 was a superb title insofar as it succeeded at everything it tried to do. it was a remake of the original doom series after all, it wasnt there to innovative, it was there to be immersive, and myself and a whole lot of other people were scared shitless by that game.

A-FUCKING-MEN. That game is amazing. It was ahead of its time when it was created, and def. scared the shit out of me too...that was SO much fun.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN theres a reason why punks like you dont work for the likes of IGN.

You sure about that?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN of course you dont. but i always try to have an idea about something im going to express my opinion about. theres a reason why punks like you dont work for the likes of IGN.

You don't have to be innovative to make a game with good game play and story behind it. My idea was pretty clear unless you're too dull to understand what I was writing. My idea was simple, they should stop competing against eachother with who can bust out the best graphics and slowly progress and make games enjoyable. 50-60$ doesn't grow on trees and where is the point of this IGN comment coming from? I wouldn't even want to work for IGN in the first place and I'm glad I don't.

Doom 3 may have been an enjoyable title for you but then again it wasn't for me, what I posted is my opinion and I value it as my opinion not as the opinion of millions of people. If you're going to try to impose your hard-ass flaming behavior here because you simply can't handle someones input then don't post at all.

quote:

Originally posted by jupiterone My idea was simple, they should stop competing against eachother with who can bust out the best graphics and slowly progress and make games enjoyable.

If there's no competition, they'd be churning out even more (I know... is that even possible?) crap than they already do.