 |
|
|
|
 |
Carlos Pereira
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jun 2004
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Slow Motion
The racial profiling card is thrown to....
Hypothetical question: What would you do as a security guard, if there had been a bomb scare the week prior at UCLA, and some teen-aged male of Middle Eastern-decent refused to produce ID when entering a building with a hundred students present? Would you profile him? Just made me think about things that run through people's heads. |
I agree with the race thing. I heard both A.Cooper and Olbermann talk about how him being Iranian just proves that it was mostly based on his race. Me? I think that's nonsense. His lawyer's also trying to imply the same idea. I'm not one to judge on that sort of issue, nor am I an expert in law, but believe me I don't think that's gonna fly in court. The reality of it is that he refused to flash an ID in the library vs. the cops took things way too far. What pisses me off the most, again, is how his lawyer sits there and says things like "...people have to be aware that these are not your typical police...these are California cops, which are known to be very aggressive". Dude...even my friend Brittany's dad Mike Thaler, (Houston Police Department Executive Assistant Chief) agreed to the fact that Houston cops are waayyy more aggressive than CA cops when I asked him, and yet you dont see them running into the University of Houston Anderson library and eletricuting the 36% of middle-easterns there (not that we regurlay get checked for ID's either).
For the bomb question...yea I can see where in that particular case (since its a bomb) there would be a racial issue involved at first glance...and the obvious, of course, is the kind of people we have today running terrorist groups. But, don't be fooled by thinking that THEY in general are the ONLY ones that run terrorism. Think of those white dudes that they caught in Iraq a couple years back planning an attack on American soil...or that group of black and white men that planned on bringing down the Sears tower earlier this year.
I guess the reality of it is that we really can't tell how, when, or what will spark a terror attack. To answer your question...I really don't know what I would do if I were a security guard and I saw a middle-eastern student entering the library, refusing to flash an ID. Considering he's a student, I would feel more at ease thinking he really wouldn't be the type of guy to have any bombs strapped to him. Then again, that is exactly what terrorists do their homework on. They figure out what Americans think (location, time, etc...) would be the least expected attack and go for the kill. Who would have ever thought that two 767's would slam into the towers and bring them down the way they did?
|
|
Nov-23-2006 08:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zeonfiend
Nath(.tx)an McWaters

Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Austin, TX, USA: TX TA #115
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by diggerz
Racial profiling is a cause of controversy. Cops are used to racially profile crimminals and potential threats for security purposes. This however brings controversy, specially because it also implies that all minorities of middle eastern decent have to face the fact that they have been profiled, and will have to suffer for the actions of crimminals profiled under the same ethnic group.
Not because they are crimminals, but because of their race.
Sounds like a bunch of crap right? |
No, it sounds like a logical conclusion to make based on prior events motivated by ethnic/racial activities that are patently against the law of the society in which the individuals were residing. Fact is, until we start developing psi-cops with telepathy, security will take precedence over feelings. If a significant portion of an ethnic group are prone to violence against another group for whatever reason (cultural, religious, etc.), then logically it must be assumed that all individuals under that grouping have the potential for that same action, be it racial or otherwise. In the end, it's no different than the profiling that insurance companies inflict on millions of Americans on the highways that establish how much they're going to take out of you for premiums. Do male drivers ages 18-25 that wear glasses pitch fits when they get shafted six ways to Sunday on insurance because their imbecile generational colleagues screwed up time and again, often killing others in the process of their own stupidity? Is that not profiling based on age, or gender, or physical ability? Why is that "okay" but not racial profiling for potential criminal activity?
Of course, that can also be taken to a ludicrous extreme, ie - the 92 year-old woman who shot three cops just a couple days ago before being gunned down herself being used to profile all elderly females with handguns as being possible would-be cop-killers. There should be some common sense, both in toeing the line of security and in granting the benefit of the doubt.
___________________
"An opinion is what you have when you don't have any facts. When you have the facts, you don't need an opinion." - Solomon Short
Facebook
|
|
Nov-23-2006 19:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:30.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|