|
Well the advantages (at least with Torq):
1. Simple to use loops. They suck on CDJ's (because it's nearly impossible to get them accurate enough to mix into/out of), but they work great in Torq. Hit a button on my trigger finger, and I get a nice 2/4/8 bar loop that keeps time.
2. Effects. I'm not a huge effects whore, so using the occasional phaser/beat repeat/etc. that Torq comes with is plenty for me (rather than buy something like and EFX-1000).
3. Sampler.
4. The library. Being able to organize your tracks into any number of playlists, and have them sortable is fantastic. You can also just load up a track, listen to it, and decide "Meh, not that one." Hard to do that when you have to find a CD, put it in, wait for it to load, etc.
5. VST/Rewire. Use as you see fit.
I really bought Torq to get more use out of my 1200's, but playing around with it and my CDJ's I really like that setup too:
A. If your needles get dirty, the timecode can get lost pretty easy. This doesn't happen with CDJ's.
B. Mixing with CDJ's is far more accurate and requires less pitch riding.
So I don't think it's such a crazy idea. I don't know if I'd be bothered to bring it all to a gig just yet though.
As for using a MIDI controller to bypass the whole CDJ/Mixer thing, if you can find me one that feels like my CDJ-1000's and Xone 92, I'd be pretty happy. And the Xone:3D doesn't count 
| quote: | Originally posted by Storyteller
Yea, the margin between buying mp3s and burning them & playing them from pc is so small, I just think it's strange.
That and you'll need to shift over your pc.. I'd rather have a box of cd's. |
|