So you're saying you submitted a metric as your result to a skill competency? Which in all rights I can understand how a competency can result in an increased revenue number, just i find it hard to word it such that when it trickles through the approval process, i'm not either repeating what the competency asked me to demonstrate or blabbing off into a completely different direction. it's the wording that's giving me an issue because i feel like these assessments are created to either GLOAT yourself or say I'm a retard and I didn't practice customer satisfaction, did not address the customer with a goal oriented procedure, yadda yadda yadda.

To me it's a verbatim test, to read what they are asking you and respond in a keen way. It bothers me greatly because I believe myself to have a significant impact in this company (similar to how you say you are past xxx in revenue), yet I'm being quizzed on assessing personal skills that should be uniform through out the company. Why can't we give monetary figures as our results, partly due to the size of the company, management is more concerned about personal development meanwhile they are the ones who are putting in these figures as their own goals.

___________________
I PUT TRADEMARKS AROUND YO MOTHAFUCKIN EYE
JUST ME N YOU