Que?

quote:

Originally posted by Frenchie ummmm? "...let this thread continue as a roll call"

i'm in

___________________

insignificant cor member alliance

quote:

Originally posted by gtron THAT'S FVGGIN WEAK ASS, FVCKFACE!!! who the hell uses images that small for avatars?! loosen up the restraints on this b!tch a bit... damn. oh and hi and stuffs.

You suck at IMG tags.

quote:

Originally posted by stren this forum is not about gigantic avatars or sigs

Just because you get pissy over sigs that are out of bounds does not qualify you for judgment.

Those were put into effect ages ago when internet bandwidth was much less. IMO setting should be changed and more should be allowed.

Your turn to counter.

lol

___________________
NOBODY DOES THIS ANYMORE

Has little to do with bandwidth, and much to do with people such as the original poster in this thread wanting to promote his homosexual agenda using unnecessary amounts of pixels. Some of us like to actually read the words on a semi-organized platform.

quote:

Originally posted by _Nut_ Just because you get pissy over sigs that are out of bounds does not qualify you for judgment.

my judgement has nothing to do with the fact that there are restrictions. Maybe Swamper will change them someday , but i'm sure the number of users has something to do with it. I don't know about others, but i enjoy it if the sig is not bigger then the post, which rarely happens in this forum anyway

___________________

insignificant cor member alliance

quote:

Originally posted by david.michael Has little to do with bandwidth, and much to do with people such as the original poster in this thread wanting to promote his homosexual agenda using unnecessary amounts of pixels. Some of us like to actually read the words on a semi-organized platform.

There is a wonderful feature to not display sigs.

Here is your diploma for failing FAQ's.

quote:

Originally posted by _Nut_ There is a wonderful feature to not display sigs. Here is your diploma for failing FAQ's.

There is also a feature of not having to read the forums at all.

All things within reason.... removing all size restrictions would make people have page-long signatures, ruining it for the rest of the people who just want to put a link to their latest mix in their sig. I've seen it happen. It's dumb.



Edit- Was unaware that I could receive a diploma for failing something. Did you get your actual diploma?

quote:

Originally posted by david.michael There is also a feature of not having to read the forums at all. All things within reason.... removing all size restrictions would make people have page-long signatures, ruining it for the rest of the people who just want to put a link to their latest mix in their sig. I've seen it happen. It's dumb. Edit- Was unaware that I could receive a diploma for failing something. Did you get your actual diploma?

Did you read my post?

quote:

Originally posted by _Nut_ IMO setting should be changed and more should be allowed.

Where did I say they should be removed? Changed and more allowed does not mean no restrictions. Where are your analytical skills?

And yes, I have a diploma from my high school, one from college, and in the near future one for a graduate degree.

What would you consider to be an acceptable size for an avatar or signature? What is the necessity for increasing these restrictions?

They just seem plenty forgiving to me.




Edit:

quote:

Changed and more allowed does not mean no restrictions.

Point being, they are unnecessary as-is, and already take up plenty of room... to what point does it leave the realm of either "fun" or "helpful" and just become bothersome?