|
| quote: | Originally posted by NeoPhono
I didn't say a thing about political bias in the media. That goes both ways, if any way.
What I'm stating is that media outlets make more money by reporting the "dark" side of news events. There are a lot of good things that are noteworthy that happen each day both at home and even in *gasp* Iraq, we simply don't hear of them. Whether it's your local news or even the multinational news giants, they all know the same thing; death, destruction, misery and conflict gets peoples' attention.
We watch the news, the news channels want more viewers, so they report what gets our attention. They report all the death and destruction they can handle. Therefore, no matter what your political slant, you do tend to get more of the negative side of things then the positive. I don't think there is any political conspiracy when it comes to the reporting of the news. I do think that the dollar speaks louder than the hope of even-balanced news reporting. |
I understand your larger point and I couldn't agree more. I have a choice to watch two very contrasting 10:00 news shows - I could watch those either from Kansas City where they looooove reporting on fires and murders, or I could get the local Lawrence news where there's significantly less negativity (we're a freakin' college town - the worst that usually occurs is drunken college kids and hazing incidents mostly). The rest of the real world news I read online in various newspapers.
And granted, I also agree that this holds in a similar manner with the Iraq news, but to a point. I think what the tell-tale signs to me when things are bearing close to the news reports is when you hear it from the testimony of the Generals in charge. When they start mentioning phrases like "brink of civil war", and "we're not winning", or when members of the Republican party like Chuck Hagel admit how shitty things are going, or when various neoconservative pundits and leaders begin turning on each other and act as though they had nothing to do with this mess, or when the President himself mentions that we're not winning (and stubbornly throws in the "we're not losing" part too, admittedly), that's when my panties get all bunched up. Sadly, I'm almost a bit calloused to hearing the deaths of innocent lives and even our troops lives being lost, which in of itself kinda pisses me off. Maybe that's not the right word - it does still affect me quite a bit actually.
So I do agree with you, but I think the larger context of sensationalism only applies to Iraq to a point - things are quite fucking horrible there and I think we have every right to know exactly how horrible they are.
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|