My opinion: What the hell were Technics thinking?!?!?!

Although it makes much less differemce, why did Pioneer decide to put a notch at 0% on the CDJ800 and leave it out on the CDJ1000? Odd behaviour.

Jarv

Thanks for all the replies. Keep em' coming.

___________________
Check out my Mashups on Soundcloud

quote:

Originally posted by blacknoizybox technics hehee *cough..T.120C..cough*

Piss off.

quote:

Originally posted by djkoolaide Piss off.

do the clickedy click

quote:

Originally posted by Jarvmeister My opinion: What the hell were Technics thinking?!?!?! Although it makes much less differemce, why did Pioneer decide to put a notch at 0% on the CDJ800 and leave it out on the CDJ1000? Odd behaviour. Jarv

I can understand Technics early models since originally it was designed for a different use, but as the CDJ is strictly DJ minded, that is odd.

never play around the zero mark anyhow.. meh.

Jay

Not at all.

I'm not sure if you are complaining on the slider locking at zero, or the initial click heard once locked.

As skot_e pointed out, you can remove the ball bearing if it bothers you, but it will still quartz lock when it reaches zero.

___________________
OMNIFEX

i used an mk2 and an mk3 and the mk2 fucking annoyed me because of that, yes

You can ajust the point of 0% pitch on a sl1200mk2 so that it´s at the same point as the quarts lock. This way it isn´t nescesary to remove the ball in the fader or to cut wires inside your tt etc.

Last edited by Rubenz on Jan-13-2007 at 00:46

doesnt make a difference. adapt. overcome.

___________________
good music is timeless.

Cheers for the replies once again.

___________________
Check out my Mashups on Soundcloud

I reckon you can just swap in a replacement pitch slider for the M3D into your MK2's