I don't really care about old or not but....

200 = £250 - £300 used

100 = £100 used

Is it really worth it. Don't need FX and always convert mp3 to wav.

Which one?

Yes but a used 100 is probably REALLY old. These things don't last forever.

The big thing on the 200 is you'll get .02 pitch precision, the 100 is .10 (5 times less accurate). The 200 will also get you the effects and such.

quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN I don't really care about old or not but.... 200 = £250 - £300 used 100 = £100 used Is it really worth it. Don't need FX and always convert mp3 to wav. Which one?

quote:

Originally posted by Ryan0751 Yes but a used 100 is probably REALLY old. These things don't last forever. The big thing on the 200 is you'll get .02 pitch precision, the 100 is .10 (5 times less accurate). The 200 will also get you the effects and such.

The CDJ100 has got exactly the same fx as the 200... all it lacks in that respect is the ability to loop, which is something I miss. I can't remember the last time I actually used the fx on my CDJ100s - having said that, the filter used to be quite useful before I had a mixer with fx and an EFX!

___________________
Stu Cox |

The 100 has effects? I had no idea

Still, it was released in the late 90's! If you buy used make sure they are in good condition.

quote:

Originally posted by Stu Cox The CDJ100 has got exactly the same fx as the 200... all it lacks in that respect is the ability to loop, which is something I miss. I can't remember the last time I actually used the fx on my CDJ100s - having said that, the filter used to be quite useful before I had a mixer with fx and an EFX!