 |
|
|
|
 |
Atmos
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location:
|
|
|
Thats a good technique if you have an accurate BPM counter. My CDJ-200's arent too accurate sometimes...might be 130 BPM and it reas something weird like 80 BPM which pisses me off...eventually it gets accurate but after two or three minutes .
|
|
Mar-09-2007 22:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
Atmos
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Heh, I'll do you guys one better:
Keep in mind that 95% of tracks are produced with a nice rounded number for their tempo (i.e. 126.00, 127.00, 128.00--no tenths or hundredths).
|
I don't know about that. When I run the songs on a program called Mixed in Key which determines the tunes keys and BPM's, most songs end up with decimal places, and by most I mean all the ones I've run on the prog. Anyway, this is still a good idea due to the fact that you have a better idea of the range between the BPM's small increments.
|
|
Mar-10-2007 15:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Haha, the reason that the Mixed in Key in showing you decimal places is the SAME reason that the CDJ's aren't perfect at BPM detection. They are just running algorithms to "guess" the BPM as accurately as they can. It's those algorithms that are innaccurate, not your tracks.
| quote: | Originally posted by Atmos
I don't know about that. When I run the songs on a program called Mixed in Key which determines the tunes keys and BPM's, most songs end up with decimal places, and by most I mean all the ones I've run on the prog. Anyway, this is still a good idea due to the fact that you have a better idea of the range between the BPM's small increments. |
|
|
Mar-10-2007 16:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
Atmos
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Ryan0751
Haha, the reason that the Mixed in Key in showing you decimal places is the SAME reason that the CDJ's aren't perfect at BPM detection. They are just running algorithms to "guess" the BPM as accurately as they can. It's those algorithms that are innaccurate, not your tracks. |
That makes sense. I created a track on Fruity Loops and I set the BPM to exactly 135...then I ran it in Mixed in Key and it read 134.89...so, fucking computers.
|
|
Mar-10-2007 17:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
Atmos
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location:
|
|
|
Yea...I'm purchasing a new pack of CD's tommorrow so I will do alot of burning and practicing. I'll make sure to run them through the prog and see the results play out on the CDJ's.
|
|
Mar-10-2007 20:43
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|