quote:

Originally posted by HouseHeads

well done boys, good work

___________________
http://www.beatport.com/jonathan-rosa/

quote:

Originally posted by Dirtyfilthy banging mix! finally something different by deep dish...

+1 Really liked this mix.

quote:

Originally posted by oldschool420 +1 Really liked this mix.

+2 I'm seeing them during conference and this mix is a great precursor.

___________________
Blitz.

Here's a tip to whomever is managing the index:

Ensure that the only " - " resides between that artist and "track title".

That way, you can paste the contents into Notepad, save it as a TXT file, then open it in Excel using the " - " as a delimiter, and easily sort columns alphabetically...i.e. sort all primarily by artist column, secondarily by title column.

Then, create a column of " - ", insert it between the other two (artist and title), copy and paste the contents into Notepad (to strip Excel's tabular formatting), and then Word (to easily remove tabs [edit #2:] [via Find & Replace], leaving you with your desired content).


edit:

quote:

Originally posted by HouseHeads the one where index actually gets updated :P

easy on the shit-talk. come over to houseaddict.com and check out a real DL thread if you think i was slacking so much.

Last edited by DigitalMP on Mar-12-2007 at 05:13

^^^ Thanks for the useful suggestions (and all your hard work to date). Much appreciated.

quote:

Originally posted by DigitalMP easy on the shit-talk. come over to houseaddict.com and check out a real DL thread if you think i was slacking so much.

No worries Digital, us over at HA love the thread.

Thanks so much for this new thread

___________________
Upcoming Events:

February 15-16: FREQUENCY 2014 at Shaw Conference Centre

Boodang Music Canada
Boodang Music Canada Facebook Group

Nice work - we needed this

quote:

Originally posted by infinity HiGH why are people so obsessed with tracklists?? fuck

Cuz if i hear a dope track, i might just want to go out and find it.


Cheers on the new thread!!! TOTAs ROCK!!!

Last edited by Vero on Mar-12-2007 at 16:53

another recommendation - you may want to either duplicate the list, but add new sets to the bottom of the list, so people can see what's recently been added.

as of now, we can see the list growing, but we don't know which are the newest additions.

yeah, it will be a bit of a pain in the ass right now, but much easier now than when it's at 10, 20, 50 pages.

quote:

Originally posted by DigitalMP another recommendation - you may want to either duplicate the list, but add new sets to the bottom of the list, so people can see what's recently been added. as of now, we can see the list growing, but we don't know which are the newest additions. yeah, it will be a bit of a pain in the ass right now, but much easier now than when it's at 10, 20, 50 pages.

me and SuperJimbo thought about this before
imo an indexed list is easiest to browse.. we thought about adding an "*" at the end of the sets that have been added in the past 7 days so people could "CTRL+F" an * and they will see new additions. Also people could just browse the thread and see whats new, thats how it was in the old thread no? what do you guys think?

quote:

Originally posted by geroin me and SuperJimbo thought about this before imo an indexed list is easiest to browse.. we thought about adding an "*" at the end of the sets that have been added in the past 7 days so people could "CTRL+F" an * and they will see new additions. Also people could just browse the thread and see whats new, thats how it was in the old thread no? what do you guys think?

That sounds like a good and simple solution. Having it indexed the way it is now is great. It wouldn't take people that long to find the new ones even if you didn't put stars, because as you said they can just browse the pages.