Originally posted by RJT
His productions and DJ sets are cold, mechanical, directionless, and bland.
I've expanded on this many times before, but his popularity (and in general, his revered status with "trancers") is an absolute mystery to me.
i thought his remix of Control Freak was rather "ill."
some of his ideas are kinda "whack", just like most of Sean Tyas' productions.
I'd file SVD him under "most promising"
also, while i find most of SVD's music very bland, i find the production values to be immensely clean. Either he spends 10x more time mastering his shit or someone gave him $10000000000000 to buy studio equipment?
___________________
Everything is beautiful. Let the music carry you. Baby I will follow you forever. Nowhere else I'd rather be when you're lying next to me. Let the music carry us together.
anti-JennyPie Alliance
SuspicionVandit: Are you God?
Paul Van Dyk 09-24-2009: No, but I can sign your sleeve under that name if you let me!
Mar-21-2007 04:43
jupiterone
housin' guide
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
Well just because someone has, say half a million dollars worth of professional monitoring and studio equipment won't make them a good musician. I think Sander is an alright producer, I'm not into trance anymore. I think most people first get into trance then expand their musical horizons into more creative and deeper styles of music. I think he has the knowledge when it comes to producing though, that or he just pays professional engineers to master and mix his productions.
Mar-21-2007 04:46
LoveHate
...........
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver
quote:
Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
same logic as who would you rather fuck in the ass. rose o'donnel or paula cole. it's lose-lose, but i had to choose, i'd do paula cole. so Sander would be my vote.
get out of here with your ignorance.
Mar-21-2007 05:05
shaw
RIP
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Intergalactic Mimosa Station
quote:
Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
i thought his remix of Control Freak was rather "ill."
some of his ideas are kinda "whack", just like most of Sean Tyas' productions.
I'd file SVD him under "most promising"
also, while i find most of SVD's music very bland, i find the production values to be immensely clean. Either he spends 10x more time mastering his shit or someone gave him $10000000000000 to buy studio equipment?
Chances are after the summer no one will remember them. Maybe Sander Van Doorn...he's been around longer so I'd guess his staying power is better. Either way, I predict that the top list this year will be mostly techno djs. Don't know why.
___________________
Mar-21-2007 05:32
jupiterone
housin' guide
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
quote:
Originally posted by LoveHate
get out of here with your ignorance.
It's not really ignorance. Ignorance means having a lack of knowledge, I'm pretty sure he knows how Tyas sounds like compared to Sander. It's just a matter of musical taste and opinion which we all have.
Mar-21-2007 05:36
idoru
You Can Call Me Al
Registered: May 2004
Location: Cascadia
quote:
Originally posted by dj_bas
Chances are after the summer no one will remember them. Maybe Sander Van Doorn...he's been around longer so I'd guess his staying power is better. Either way, I predict that the top list this year will be mostly techno djs. Don't know why.
Who gives a shit?
Sorry, I saw an opening and I had to take it!
Mar-21-2007 05:38
bas
Stronger Lover
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Here I Am Baby
quote:
Originally posted by idoru
Who gives a shit?
Sorry, I saw an opening and I had to take it!