 |
|
|
|
 |
Tony Morello
The Renegade Master

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
|
|
Apr-12-2007 19:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Ha! I have Torq, and I actually suggested that they implement a view that looks LIKE the CDJ-1000's. Why? The Torq or Ableton wave display is detailed for sure, but it's too busy and you can't see an overview of the whole track in an easy to look at manner.
I thought the 1000's was pretty stupid when I first got them, but then I realized they are actually really well done. They only show you the "upper half" of the wave form (to keep it clean looking), and very clearly show you a breakdown or what not coming up. You don't really need a lot of resolution in that application.
As for not having that on TT's, haven't you ever looked at your vinyl? DJ's have been reading the vinyl for years.
| quote: | Originally posted by Spirit5
I actually like it without the wave display. It didn't seem to help me that much. It's much more accurate on programs like Ableton Live or MixMeister or any of those programs like Torque or Serato, than it is on the tiny screen on a 1000. You don't have that on TTs, so you really just have to know your tunes. And I agree, the 1000s are over-priced. |
|
|
Apr-12-2007 19:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
If Denon hadn't had so many issues with their DN-S3500's, perhaps they could have had a decent competitor on the market that would force Pio to drop their prices.
| quote: | Originally posted by Tony Morello
i agree they're overpriced, but because they're that good, people pay it
myself included |
|
|
Apr-12-2007 19:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
Spirit5
Nobody

Registered: Jun 2005
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Ryan0751
Ha! I have Torq, and I actually suggested that they implement a view that looks LIKE the CDJ-1000's. Why? The Torq or Ableton wave display is detailed for sure, but it's too busy and you can't see an overview of the whole track in an easy to look at manner.
I thought the 1000's was pretty stupid when I first got them, but then I realized they are actually really well done. They only show you the "upper half" of the wave form (to keep it clean looking), and very clearly show you a breakdown or what not coming up. You don't really need a lot of resolution in that application.
As for not having that on TT's, haven't you ever looked at your vinyl? DJ's have been reading the vinyl for years. |
Yeah you can look at your vinyl and I know they do, and when I had TTs I did, but sometimes at clubs, it's dark so it's not always easy to see a black vinyl at all clubs. Not every club or bar has the DJ booth illuminated so you can see the vinyl. I think the best, in that situation, is to just know the track, listen to the track, vs. starring at a piece of vinyl. Maybe to look when the track is almost over with, which is the same thing you can do on CDJs that don't have WAVE display, see how long the track has left and mix it in from there. It's actually better on CDJs, because you can see how many minutes and seconds are left remaining. You really can't do that on TTs.
|
|
Apr-12-2007 20:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
Mmanu
Green Pea

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: pas loin
|
|
|
Apr-14-2007 00:16
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|