quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 The reason clubs are always on the hitlist is because greedy politicians have made the rules so strict that its literally impossible not to somehow violate them. Why? So they can get their clammy hands on some of the money being made. Not only that, but in the downtown core they want the clubs out to make way for condos which bring in more CITY taxes than clubs do.

I think you've missed a key point. It's NIMBY-ism, pure and simple. Clubs are absolutely HATED by residential neighbours, and its always been this way. The hatred was the driving force behind the creation of the club district in the first place. The idea was to put them all in one area, don't grant any new licences outside the district, and the "problems" will all be contained in one manageable area.

You are correct about condos bringing in more revenue to the city than clubs though.

quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 WHICH IS EXACTLY WHY I SAY IT IS UNWISE TO CALL POLITICIANS AND MEDIA TO WHINE ABOUT STUFF BECAUSE YOU ARE ONLY PLAYING INTO THEIR GAME. What nightclubs and patrons needs to to is unite to form political clout of their own. But sadly the only thing people do around here is try to backstab each other so in the end we all lose and the old fart whiners and politicians get their way.

suggesting that patrons of a club unite is simply impractical and won't work, IMHO.

When various minority groups can't even effectively unite on a political front, how is a group of club-goers who don't know each other, don't care about each other, don't live in the same city, etc. going to form an effective group?

you're essentially calling for a patron lobby group to be formed...that takes time, energy and money. so...who benefits financially from the situation that they are going to invest the time, energy and money to form said group?

Besides, won't an organized and vocal group of patrons simply draw the same attention to the club on the political and legal fronts that complaining to authorities will do?

so...what's the suggestion? "suck it up or don't go" works on an individual level, and is the reason I *rarely* go to Guv anymore...but it doesn't solve the very real issue of potentially dangrous and potentially illegal overcrowding.

quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 WHICH IS EXACTLY WHY I SAY IT IS UNWISE TO CALL POLITICIANS AND MEDIA TO WHINE ABOUT STUFF BECAUSE YOU ARE ONLY PLAYING INTO THEIR GAME. What nightclubs and patrons needs to to is unite to form political clout of their own. But sadly the only thing people do around here is try to backstab each other so in the end we all lose and the old fart whiners and politicians get their way.

I agree with this, back in the rave days we were more united, now it's just stupidness. However I doubt we'd have the capacity to get super organized as a club community as we're very fragmented, although I hope someone proves me wrong.

As for the pool analogy, it would be better put like this:

"Pools are bad because they allow wet people to swim and some of those people may drown if they don't know how to swim. Because of this risk there should be no pools at all."

A solution to people being completely out of control when drinking etc is removing/adjusting one aspect that CONTRIBUTES to this. Last call. Extend last call, then eventually eliminate it. More $ for the clubs/bars, more money for the area. Phase it in so people in the city don't go bonkers with it. The way I see it is people will drink anyway, why not make things more fluid and easier? People drink like FISH already now probably because they think "Oh shit I have only 20 min left then I can't drink anymore so I have to buy and drink all the booze I can before then."

That way even if they drink up until they are going to leave the club they won't be stumbling out like drunken idiots (hopefully) because they've staggered the amount of booze they've had. (obviously there will be exceptions with people who will drink like crazy period) but I doubt it is the norm.

___________________
Und ich tanz einfach weiter...

Last edited by Endlesswave on Apr-23-2007 at 21:35

quote:

Originally posted by Flec while i dont want to see our scene completely ruined, i think its completely wrong for you to suggest that we have to make the choice between overcrowded, unsafe and overpriced nightlife VS no nightlife at all and to compare these attributes to other places around the world and conclude that because its just as dangerous somewhere else in the world that makes it justified here is rediculus as well.

the comparison point is to prove how spoiled and whiney we are here...

ANd its that spoiledness that helps result in nothing great ever being accomplished in Toronto. (among other things)

quote:

Originally posted by van haaster I think you've missed a key point. It's NIMBY-ism, pure and simple. Clubs are absolutely HATED by residential neighbours, and its always been this way. The hatred was the driving force behind the creation of the club district in the first place. The idea was to put them all in one area, don't grant any new licences outside the district, and the "problems" will all be contained in one manageable area. You are correct about condos bringing in more revenue to the city than clubs though.

The problem with these NIMBYs though is the fact that most of them moved in AFTER the area was designated as an entertianment district. And id argue that most dwellings there were built BECAUSE of it.

ANd those who were there before the clubs have seen their neighbourhood go from being a direlect row house neighbourhood full of empty warehouses and gay bath houses to a very desirable and pricey piece of real estate.

Clubs in other parts of the world are similar to or far more excessivly tight than in Canada, and yes others elsewhere are far more lax. That does not make it right, just giving a more realistic perspective. You have made a wonderfully false, and always skewed generalization so as to prove your point. I've gone through the evolution of clubs in Toronto, or de-evolution of the club scene and some of the things I've seen, seem considerably more lax.

Your whole speech is void of the overarching issue of drugs, drug use, drug dealing and the whole underworld connected to drugs. So for a whole slew of seemingly unconnected people; now connected by their love of clubs to use whatever soapbox necessary to get their point across, what is this unified conglomerate of clubbers going to say when the drug issue comes up.

Sure there are BS laws positioned to protect political interests, however the club scene is a microcasm of some nasty shit and its all rolled into overcrowded buildings. This scene needs to be watched; could be watched more, regulated more, and frankly we are lucky (in Guv's case) that it is not.

Any Elliot Ness would walk right into Guv, turn the lights on and expose some especially illegal activity and substances.

Certainly an establishment that is well run with good clientele would help property value, not hinder it. Fortunately for the Guv, most edm'ers are usually well behaved compared to other groups, esp when you consider overflow crowds like that can easily increase tensions. Happy pillz, maybe?

What we're talking about here is a fairly decent club that could be a GREAT club with proper ticket/crowd controls. When every 1/3 or 1/4 post is about the crowd being pushy and aggressive, I wouldn't consider that whiney. I fact, I'd consider that symptomatic of other problems. And take it from me, for someone who bodybuilds and is bigger than 99 percent of the edm crowd, even I find it irritating.

As bar staff, I'm quite surprised you haven't sympathized with these TOTAs.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Ravemontreal Once I took a piss in front of everybody at Stereo. Put the garbage under the mixer, and did it right there while people were dancing and screaming. people thought I was playing with the mixer but I was playing with my zizi.

quote:

Originally posted by Enjoy a classic from the aria days: me: are you on TA? girl: uhhhh... im on speed

YAY!!! JAYX1 is BACK!!!

quote:

Originally posted by 7-4-7 Clubs in other parts of the world are similar to or far more excessivly tight than in Canada, and yes others elsewhere are far more lax. That does not make it right, just giving a more realistic perspective. You have made a wonderfully false, and always skewed generalization so as to prove your point. I've gone through the evolution of clubs in Toronto, or de-evolution of the club scene and some of the things I've seen, seem considerably more lax. Your whole speech is void of the overarching issue of drugs, drug use, drug dealing and the whole underworld connected to drugs. So for a whole slew of seemingly unconnected people; now connected by their love of clubs to use whatever soapbox necessary to get their point across, what is this unified conglomerate of clubbers going to say when the drug issue comes up. Sure there are BS laws positioned to protect political interests, however the club scene is a microcasm of some nasty shit and its all rolled into overcrowded buildings. This scene needs to be watched; could be watched more, regulated more, and frankly we are lucky (in Guv's case) that it is not. Any Elliot Ness would walk right into Guv, turn the lights on and expose some especially illegal activity and substances.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Ravemontreal Once I took a piss in front of everybody at Stereo. Put the garbage under the mixer, and did it right there while people were dancing and screaming. people thought I was playing with the mixer but I was playing with my zizi.

quote:

Originally posted by Enjoy a classic from the aria days: me: are you on TA? girl: uhhhh... im on speed

In socially conservative North America the entire concept of late-night dancing and revelry is intrinsically countercultural. I don't see how anyone can expect nightlife to be legitimized and respected. It has always represented the dark underbelly of society--that which is sinful and wrong. Dance with the devil...