Originally posted by agentdansmith
I don't understand what the issue is TBH. You just select which channel you want to cue and then use the cue/mix knob - easy!
I've heard that the xone62 is a bit trickier as it hasn't got a cue/mix knob but the 92 has.
because to cue two channels at the same time you need to un-select 1 channel (if already cued) and then press the two channels at the same time (and the level of precision needed here is a little more than i would expect) whereas every other mixer ive used, you just press any amount of channels you want and they all get added to your headphones.
basically i dont see the benefits of such a system?
___________________
May-04-2007 03:07
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
because to cue two channels at the same time you need to un-select 1 channel (if already cued) and then press the two channels at the same time (and the level of precision needed here is a little more than i would expect)
Er... no you don't. If you're having to press more than one button simultaneously on a Xone to cue then your mixer's probably knackered.
___________________
Stu Cox |
May-04-2007 07:50
agentdansmith
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Cannock, UK
quote:
Originally posted by Stu Cox
Er... no you don't. If you're having to press more than one button simultaneously on a Xone to cue then your mixer's probably knackered.
Actually no, he's right.
On my Xone92 (only 4 weeks old) to cue 2 channels at the time, you have to press both cue buttons at the same time.
But... why would you want to do this when you can just cue one channel and then use the cue/mix knob to bring in the playing track?
May-04-2007 08:51
Isolator
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Re: my gig
quote:
Originally posted by nec
I played first time in bigger club on xone 92 and it wasnt that easy to get used to it. First I couldnt figure how to cue 2 tracks at once and guy who played before couldnt help me, because he didnt know (he had ableton live preformance).
The next thing were CDJs. I'm used to my Pioneer cdj 800 mk2, but those 800s in club seemed like much less sensitive than mine. When I move jog on my cds its totally different ratio. Moving jog (platter) on my cds for 2cms seemed like I had to move it for 1/4.
Thank god, after 20 minutes I got quite used to it..
Anyone has similar experience?
I just got a Xone about a week ago and it definitely takes a little getting used to. It's very good and very precise, but it is not very forgiving. I had used a friends a few times before and gotten the hang of it, but I definitely would not want to have been playing out at a club for my first time on one.
Ultimately, every different piece of equipment that you can get time on will ultimately prepare you for the day that you show up at a club that has something different from the norm. Definitely all part of being a DJ.
May-04-2007 22:18
Allied Nations
Make it happen cap'n
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: MTHELL
quote:
Originally posted by agentdansmith
Actually no, he's right.
On my Xone92 (only 4 weeks old) to cue 2 channels at the time, you have to press both cue buttons at the same time.
But... why would you want to do this when you can just cue one channel and then use the cue/mix knob to bring in the playing track?
Mixing 3+ sources maybe... Would be easier to have a pio style cue system.
___________________
Fortuna Favet Fortibus.
May-04-2007 22:30
DJ Z
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: TX
yeah man...little differences can get worse...
....my set up at home used to be on a desk, so i would just pull my chair up, sit down and mix....then i started noticing that there is a difference between sitting down at the decks and STANDING with them (standing when playing in public).
now i never sit when mixing because i am a firm believer in "you should train the same way you fight"...
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont, Soviet Canuckistan
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
because to cue two channels at the same time you need to un-select 1 channel (if already cued) and then press the two channels at the same time (and the level of precision needed here is a little more than i would expect) whereas every other mixer ive used, you just press any amount of channels you want and they all get added to your headphones.
basically i dont see the benefits of such a system?
That's xone 32.
On 62, you press whatever channels you want to add to cue and it gets add on
Originally posted by chinamon
not true. i say "ugh"
but i am a tranny.
quote:
Originally posted by kotsy
lol colour me retarded
May-05-2007 01:24
Lunar Phase 7
Not a Flying Toy.
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Zone 4
The classic is turning up with the mixer already in red. And then being told the monitor is out.
Gotta love that.
Oh and the fuck tard befor you has already taken the pitch through the roof.
May-06-2007 18:24
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
quote:
Originally posted by agentdansmith
Actually no, he's right.
On my Xone92 (only 4 weeks old) to cue 2 channels at the time, you have to press both cue buttons at the same time.
But... why would you want to do this when you can just cue one channel and then use the cue/mix knob to bring in the playing track?
Really? I'll admit I haven't used a 92 for a while but when I used one last I didn't notice that, I'll take you word for it though. I've used 62s and 464s pretty extensively so I probably just assumed that it wouldn't be any worse, particularly seeing that they managed to fix so many problems between the 62 and the 92.
And yeah, most of the time the cue/mix knob will suffice, but as soon as you start bringing in an extra source you'll want to be able to listen to every possible 'pair' of tracks (e.g. 1 & 2, 2 & 3 then 1 & 3) to make sure they're all in time... gets a bit tricky without a very good cueing system, but at least you've got the functionality to listen to any two channels at once on the 92 anyway if you need to.