|
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Let's be honest; they'd be hounded to hell both from abroad and at home had they not.
(I'm assuming you're refering to their toppling of Saddam? Or were you refering to ealier than that?) |
Referring to the toppling of Saddam. Iraq had zilch to do with 9/11, and was merely to finish what daddy started. I'll admit that I was pro-Afghanistan, because there was some logic to that invasion. The bastion of terrorism, a brutal regime that had inflicted terror on another nation, and where arugably a large majority of terrorists and their leaders were based. Fine. But the US royally screwed up operations there. But Iraq? That should've been left alone. Like so many other countries and empires throughout history and has history as demonstrated time and time again, it would have crumbled from the inside, led by the people. Dictatorships have been taken down in other parts of the world without bombs.
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Sure they could have printed a real harshly worded letter (ala U.N.) but what would that prove other than giving a green light for terrorists to continue their agendas?
Nobody likes seeing foreign forces in someone else's backyard, but if the problem from abroad is because of you, then responsibility lies with those who created it.
|
Again, I repeat, Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. Afghanistan and Iraq are two separate things in my opinion. The first was a legtimitate case, but botched beyond repair, the second was an aboslute SCAM that anyone with half a brain cell could've seen was the WRONG move. And whatever shred of 'right' there was about it, the troops should have been pulled out, immediately after Saddam was toppled. Sure, anarchy would have ensued, but it would've ironed itself out. But this doesn't get away from the fact that the US should not have gone there in the first place. The first Gulf war was legitimate for so many reasons, least not because Iraq had attacked another country.
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
They're paying for it may times over (that's an understatement) and hopefully next time, they'll think long and hard before supporting 'rebels' and 'freedom fighters' in another country again. |
George Bush is a 'Freedom Fighter'. What say you about sending North Korean troops over onto US soil to bring the US democracy?
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Mikey Mike
Social outcasts are often of the opinion that they must have a drink before being able to loosen up with their inhibitions, thus being able to have a good time.
There's a word that sums up this sort of behaviour, and that word is 'reject.' |
|