quote:

Originally posted by Marc Summers No... You gave up, and got lazy.

quote:

Originally posted by basvh i hear loads of dj's complaining. Some big time djs have stated in their riders that they don't want MK3's but MK2's.

yep. i agree. i prefer the mk2 over the mk3. i can't realy put a finger on it but i like the mk2 better.

___________________
Digweed is not from this planet.

quote:

Originally posted by basvh Better then the mk3???? Hummmm simple answer: MK2!!!! MK3 still have some software problems, the tempo doesn't stay at the same rate which is quite annoying when mixing because you have to adjust your pitch all the time.

Utter shite.

Upgrade the firmware and the BPM counters remain on the rail.

quote:

Originally posted by Marc Summers No... You gave up, and got lazy.

No, I live in a country that has 1.2 billion people, and not a single record store.

I still DJ twice a week, and I still buy all my music, instead of getting tunes on p2p.

By the time vinyl gets to me, it costs almost 12-15 pounds a record.... so it's not that i got lazy, I got tired of buying tunes based on 1'30" samples that ended up being a waste of money.

Last edited by nikhil chinapa on May-12-2007 at 22:08