Originally posted by RJT
You could play a 192kbps MP3 in any club you'll ever play and nobody will be able to tell the difference.
Anyone who says they can is either:
A. Lying
B. A Mutant
I would agree. but it comes down to what system the club has and in what state of quality the 192 is.
___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)
Jun-14-2007 14:00
RJT
last minute disco
Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by montana
I would agree. but it comes down to what system the club has and in what state of quality the 192 is.
My post was made assuming it was the highest possible quality 192 kbps (i.e. purchased from a reputable source) - you can't polish a turd after all
And honestly - I don't presume to have been to every club in the world, but I've been to quite a few across the globe, and not one of them was in such a fashion that it was remotely near to listening to something on a home system/headphones/etc.
Originally posted by agentdansmith
Can you provide a source for this "fact" please?
Years of experience, and not just my own, but those of clubbers and DJ's alike who have far more years on their feet than I do.
Honestly - the whole audiophile debate was just made for the internet, because all the little boys and girls can sit here and say "OMG It's such a HUGE difference" knowing full well that their claim will never be verified in a real world setting.
For that reason alone it's really no use to even argue about it.
I think you would be surprised actually.
I think a lot depends on how well you know the system to start with but on some of the systems I play on a regular basis I believe I can tell. As I said, it depends on how intimate you are with the sound system though.
Could I sell the difference between a 320 and a 192 on the same system... probably not.
I have always been able to tell the difference between CDs and vinyl on those systems. Call me a mutant if you want but I bet I'm not alone.
That said, I don't think the average clubber would notice or care if they did, and I don't think the difference is so great that it has a negative effect on the overall outcome anyway.
If people stop dancing because you have playing a low quality MP3 then you know you are playing something that sounds so shit even your deaf uncle could tell.
In answer to the original question, does a wav sound better than a MP3, sure it does. Does it make a big difference on the dancefloor, no it doesn't and it should never stop you from playing them. For me 192s are fine too.
one of the reasons i don't play 192 kbps mp3s is because i like to record my live sets even if i don't share them, and i like the audio quality to be consistent for later listening.
Jun-14-2007 14:58
Project-K
JD ëtictsile
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Laval, Quebec
I'm sure there must be some people who can tell the difference, but I'd be willing to bet that even the majority of those who say they can would think a 128kbps mp3 with pre recorded vinyl pops and distortion sounds better than an uncompressed wav file if they weren't informed of the source in advance.
___________________
When bread becomes toast, it can never go back to being bread again.
Jun-14-2007 16:17
Allayla
tech tribal sound
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: AZ
All you are gonna get are mixed opinions on the subject.
Its clear that there are the few bitter mp3 dj's in here trying to justify all their asinine mp3 purchases. in my opinion an mp3 is worth zero whatever the quality. That doesn't meen it wont sound good in a club, it just meens that i wouldn't pay anything for mp3 music.
Originally posted by starboy
All you are gonna get are mixed opinions on the subject.
Its clear that there are the few bitter mp3 dj's in here trying to justify all their asinine mp3 purchases. in my opinion an mp3 is worth zero whatever the quality. That doesn't meen it wont sound good in a club, it just meens that i wouldn't pay anything for mp3 music.
Sounds like you're just trying to justify not buying your music.
___________________
When bread becomes toast, it can never go back to being bread again.
Jun-14-2007 17:21
Nemesis44
ZZZZZzzzzzz.....
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton
quote:
Originally posted by Project-K
I'm sure there must be some people who can tell the difference, but I'd be willing to bet that even the majority of those who say they can would think a 128kbps mp3 with pre recorded vinyl pops and distortion sounds better than an uncompressed wav file if they weren't informed of the source in advance.
As a DJ your ears aren't as well trained in comparison to when you enter the world of producing. Then your ears come alive and you instantly recognise what you would choose to boost and how the sound is percieved over all. It really does change your whole perception.
You also develop in instant recognition for mud, i.e. the effect you get on lower quality MP3s. Digital mp3 compression doesn't handle bass particularly well.