|
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I've never said the breakdown was pointless- I took that from your post. The breakdown has a point, and it's judging how well that point is executed that gives us useful evaluation of music. Empirical examination of why NC put that breakdown there, considered against his other productions, leads me to believe it's just a poorly executed breakdown that doesn't fulfill the intended point. |
That is only relevant to your personal opinion of the track. You don't like it because of 'see above'. I have no problem with that, but don't make it sound like there is something objectively wrong with the track, which would imply i'm ignorant for not acknowledging it.
I didn't say the breakdown is pointless, i just said that it goes nowhere in a self-ironic kind of way. It was a way of describing what happens soundwise over a period of time with words that are not my own, so to speak. And as i have explained, i like that breakdown.
|