 |
|
|
|
 |
Magnetonium
Dubstep = Douchestep

Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Port Burwell, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
that bomber was made for one thing and that is to run a suicide gauntlet across the Urals into Europe and maybe over the pole into our Northern territories. aside from that it's useless.
|
Thats not what those bombers are designed for, not for fun toy-rides or passenger express. And they can go half-way around Earth (far enough).
Russian weapons have not been used widely outside of Russia since 1950s, and mostly they have lacked other important logistics ... air support, for example. I mean, how can you protect a top-of-the-class Russian tank without air support in a battle? In Korean war, Soviet plans dominated the skies. In WW2 we smashed the powerful Nazi armies. For most part Russian arms have been used in proportions during conflicts since WW2, and they didnt break down or stopped firing ... the politics of war can sometimes defeat much better armed troops. But the experience of using these arms has shown these buyers of Russian arms to buy what they expect ... AK-47, for example is a classic proven successful assault rifle that is unparalleled in cost, design and efficiency. Though you cant give credit to it for winning any large conflicts, it has had it parts.
When USA is on the other side of any conflict, it will be hard for Russian weapons to make the impact that they have been waiting for in the last 50+ years ...
P.S. Don't forget, it was only the Russian-made missiles that have so far been able to shoot down American stealth craft ... imagine having these guns in big numbers and supported by strong army and air defense ... then they'll make a difference. One-two Russian anti-missile batteries cant make much difference against NATO forces many thousands strong.
___________________
Whenever you go and buy something, you are affecting someone somewhere, be it environment, a person, or a community - you're making a statement with what you buy. So make it a smart choice ... Its a big picture
Last edited by Magnetonium on Aug-22-2007 at 11:55
|
|
Aug-22-2007 11:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Magnetonium
Russian weapons have not been used widely outside of Russia since 1950s, and mostly they have lacked other important logistics ... air support, for example. I mean, how can you protect a top-of-the-class Russian tank without air support in a battle? In Korean war, Soviet plans dominated the skies. In WW2 we smashed the powerful Nazi armies. For most part Russian arms have been used in proportions during conflicts since WW2, and they didnt break down or stopped firing ... the politics of war can sometimes defeat much better armed troops. But the experience of using these arms has shown these buyers of Russian arms to buy what they expect ... AK-47, for example is a classic proven successful assault rifle that is unparalleled in cost, design and efficiency. Though you cant give credit to it for winning any large conflicts, it has had it parts.
When USA is on the other side of any conflict, it will be hard for Russian weapons to make the impact that they have been waiting for in the last 50+ years ...
P.S. Don't forget, it was only the Russian-made missiles that have so far been able to shoot down American stealth craft ... imagine having these guns in big numbers and supported by strong army and air defense ... then they'll make a difference. One-two Russian anti-missile batteries cant make much difference against NATO forces many thousands strong. |
wtf are going on about dude?
|
|
Aug-22-2007 11:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:09.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|