|
| quote: | Originally posted by derail
Hmm, I can't see evidence of extreme cuts when I run frequency analyses of mastered trance tracks through Wavelab. Depending on the artist and overall vibe they have going on, that 0Hz-43Hz region ranges from extremely high to quite subdued. I generally aim to get my tracks towards the "quite subdued" region in the subs, just so I know the subs aren't going to go nuts on speakers which go down that low. But I don't high pass filter the sub bass and try to remove those frequencies completely. I've been to five mastering engineers so far and none of them removed the subs. Where did you get your figure of 90% from? Why do all the trance tracks I've analysed still have healthy levels in the subs?
I don't do any work which is pure subs though. I'll sometimes use a bass which doesn't really go up past 100-120Hz, but that's about as low as I'll go. |
errm, sorry for being not clear, I mean that most high pass there...which means there is still something going, but definitely not too much...also the inaudible sub-bass makes it harder to reach higher volumes, that's the reason why most engineers tend to highpass...that's all...ask anyone else, if you don't believe me 
___________________
Help me make soundtrack for my grandpa´s art exhibition:
Check out my topic about it here
Thank you!
|