|
Re: FAO: Moral Hazard (& Anyone else interested in Kant and Religion)
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Check out the description of my first graduate level seminar class:
So - my question to Craig (and anyone else who wants to discuss it - I'm looking at you Alon, Halcyon, Jiveboguy, etc.), does the notion that a religious foundation for ethics and duty can be derived entirely from reason and without divine revelation seem at all plausible to you?
|
totally plausible... this is the reason why I stopped reading C.S. Lewis, as Lewis was arguing the same concept rather poorly.
The come back is this. In any 'pack' animal it becomes necessary to align yourself with other members of your pack in order to succeed.
You just translate that 'alignment' concept to humans and its a great argument for the basis of ethics. I.e. I am ethical not because of god, but because in order to succeed I have to work together with my human pack, because together we form a super entity that has enhanced survival characteristics than if we were all loners.
___________________
Светопресавление
your pearl casting hero
|