 |
|
|
|
 |
Mr.Mystery
Static Guru

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Vantaa
|
|
|
Sep-21-2007 09:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
the_gamemaster
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Derby/Nottingham, UK
|
|
|
On timecoded vinyls you can't see the grooves in the record itself so cant tell where the beakdown etc. is without looking at the waveform on the screen, however i presume you can use really rubbish cartridges and it wont make any difference to the sound quality.
|
|
Sep-21-2007 11:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
ponsshin
Trance free since 2007

Registered: May 2007
Location: London, UK
|
|
|
Sep-21-2007 11:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Looking at the waveforms on the screen isn't a problem. And if it's dark, it's actually nicer than trying to see your records.
As for cartridges... you absolutely CANNOT skimp on those. You need a loud, clear timecode signal going into your laptop or you will have a NIGHTMARE of a time (think, the music stops or starts skipping randomly).
I have both Serato and Torq, and I find that Serato is a bit more stable as far as latency and keeping a very stable timecode signal. But Torq is actually pretty darn close, and it's half the price. There are other things in Serato that I feel make it a more "professional" application, but for dicking around at home Torq is fine.
I actually currently have Torq running with my 1200-MK5's, and Serato running on my CDJ-1000's. Serato and CDJ's is very, very nice. The system just works amazingly well, is super accurate, and anything introduced by using timecode is imperceptible.
| quote: | Originally posted by the_gamemaster
On timecoded vinyls you can't see the grooves in the record itself so cant tell where the beakdown etc. is without looking at the waveform on the screen, however i presume you can use really rubbish cartridges and it wont make any difference to the sound quality. |
|
|
Sep-21-2007 13:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
dJohn
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location: 619
|
|
|
I see what your trying to ask now.
Pretty much, it's a self answering question...the only reason to use vinyl nowadays is for time controlled applications such as torq, ssl, and fs. If you're sticking to vinyl simply because of the feel, or don;t have CDJs, then time controlled is the way to go, for obvious reasons. Latency is hardly noticeable, BUT, because it is a setup based on digital components, there is a chance of computer based errors occuring, or in the worst case, your computer crashing(which has never happened to me...but did to my friend, DURING A GIG.)
Otherwise, if your stikcing with vinyl, non-time controlled vinyl is pretty much obsolete for your purposes. It's just not worth it to spend 13 bucks on one song for one record.
|
|
Sep-21-2007 17:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
ponsshin
Trance free since 2007

Registered: May 2007
Location: London, UK
|
|
|
Sep-21-2007 18:32
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:49.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|