 |
|
|
|
 |
miamitranceman
Extreme tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Miami
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by djkoolaide
I've owned Torq since last September, and it is great, especially for the price tag. Keep in mind, I was playing in my bedroom back then.
In the past 4 months or so, I've started playing out, and now hold a residency at 3 clubs. Torq just doesn't cut it. When it gets loud, audio quality sucks. And having the program crash with a packed dancefloor is not a good thing either.
So, I bought Serato today. Excited to see how it works for me this weekend.
Don't get me wrong, Torq is a great program, but using it in a real live setting just isn't a good thing. |
I can't say I've had the same experiences in live situations. I've gig at a few large clubs down here and haven't noticed a sound degradation at all. There are lots of factors like mp3 bitrate and the club's sound settings to take into consideration. I've also never had a crash even when doing gigs outside all day in the hot Miami summer sun.
That being said, there are definitely some needed improvements like the speed of the internal browser, the pitch lock, and the sampler operation. The first two have been confirmed issues that will be improved in the upcoming v. 1.5. By all accounts, this update will be huge so stay tuned!
___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!
www.mixcloud.com/jluger
|
|
Oct-12-2007 20:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
djkoolaide
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jul 2004
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by miamitranceman
I've gig at a few large clubs down here and haven't noticed a sound degradation at all. There are lots of factors like mp3 bitrate and the club's sound settings to take into consideration. |
No, those weren't factors in my situations. I even tested that by ripping a CD into WAV format, playing it through Torq, and playing the same disc through a CDJ. The CDJ sounded much cleaner. It may be a minor difference, but nonetheless, there is a difference.
Also, used Serato for two gigs tonight...worked great, exactly what I expected, although I did find that the scratching/record movement does NOT sound as realistic as Torq. Maybe I'm just doing something wrong, but I did have the hi-fi resampler enabled, and I don't really know what else there is to do.
|
|
Oct-13-2007 10:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
Konix
Banned
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Detroit
|
|
|
| quote: | | Serato...worked great, exactly what I expected, although I did find that the scratching/record movement does NOT sound as realistic as Torq. |
You're joking, right?
|
|
Oct-15-2007 13:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
It's totally fine. If you are looking for something to use at gigs, spend a little more for the piece of mind. I think that's what people are really saying.
| quote: | Originally posted by Jeremy H
I've heard almost only positive things about Torq from the people I know that own it. (And their opinions are not biased because of that)
Strange to hear the opposit here! Thinking of buying it myself soon. |
|
|
Oct-17-2007 17:51
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:12.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|