 |
|
|
|
 |
jon jon
viva la clubland

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Footwork
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Swamper
the last part (monetary policy/world bank) is the most important... |
I agree.
| quote: | Originally posted by Swamper
the 9/11 part is full of flaws and debunked theories |
Probably, and even if the doc is wrong on SOME of the key points, it would still generally do a very job of convincing me. For some reason the stuff about WTC building #7 was a smoking gun of sorts.
I've heard some of the debunking but not in relation to these particular claims. Can someone take the time and post them? Or point me in the right direction SPECIFICALLY on these comments please.
| quote: | Originally posted by Zentac_75
Best proof why its bullshit....The documentary claims that the US government pulled of the greatest hoax the world has ever seen, involving thousands people and fooling millions. Yet the same government can not prevent some college students conspiracy theory from making it to the public. Ps. The guy is still alive, that should be proof enough that his theory is BS. |
I disagree completely, in fact one of the concurrent themes in the doc is that information/idealogies can be so blantantly real, true, and right in front of your face people don't even notice it. Think Hitler in Mein Kempf.... Also people are scared to believe in said "new" ideas. For some it would mean completely rejecting a way of life (in particular in relation to institutional religion), people would rather succomb to a falsehood, it's so much "easier" than challenging and questioning. (kind of like the dinosaur fossil anecdote offered, people tend to prefer the easiest way of doing anything, in this case blind faith is easier than a complicated mixed bag of faiths)
The US Government acknowledging and challenging the claims made (in particular on 9/11) would to some extent ad credibility to them being worth noting. Not only that but don't underestimate how big of a part technology has played in this new era of information. Realistically it would be FUCKING hard to kybosh (sp?) this documentary from being spread around the internet. (thankfully the internetz is still a civil liberty we have full control over, well mostly)
| quote: | Originally posted by DaRoZa
and if it takes the half-assed theory from the movie to debunk the supernatural aspects of religion in any one person, they're a fucking idiot
|
Although I abandoned my faith/rationale behind institutional religion from a very young age, I've still always retained the spiritual side of it (in relation to the core principles offered up essentially by the Bible). I've always had a deep spiritual sense (to be fair, coupled with a belief in each man being his own Zarathustra) and with really no answers or direction to what that could be, I've kind of just always ran with all I know. (Roman Catholism, specifically Jesus/God as a higher power as a reference point) Maybe that did make me a "fucking idiot", but it was a raw natural gut feeling (typically human) thing for me to. Based on how blatantly (and imo effectively) this doc. debuncts spefically the Bible I'm not ashamed to admit that the spiritual DIRECTION of my faith has been almost completely shattered.
| quote: | Originally posted by DaRoZa
and the second main thing that bugged me was them jumping to conclusions about conspiracy theories and the illuminati (or whoever's) future agenda... they state some interesting facts and show interviews... but then say that because of this that means that there is some sinister long term plan involving the world population getting axed and people getting microchipped, without any proof of that. just because one pillar of a conspiracy theory is proven to be true doesn't mean the rest of it is 
|
I see what you're saying, and again I'll agree the documentary isn't perfect. It does make some ridiculous deductions especially near the end. But I think overall (in a general sense) it wanted to give you insight into what is NOW easier with the LARGE removal of our civil liberties. (and this perpetuates the motive for why a 9/11 event would make sense from a financial statement point of view). {on an aside this reminded me about key facets of the doc "The Corporation" and how people can easily disassociate moral decision making processes if they are under the umbrella of a company mandate} I find it easier to accept the Orwellian themes when I think in terms of consumerism. The bottom line is that companies want as much information as possible on us as best to maximize selling products to us. (this is nothing new)
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
The question is, what does it deliver? |
a comment on the current state of global economics (and how little control we have over the decision making process, or what the general population EVEN KNOWS about it), a take on the catholic religion and how it is basically a plagarized fraud... no? Based on your comment Aaron I'm guessing you weren't at all impressed with the doc? I'm interested to hear what you have to say about it.
___________________
http://www.beatport.com/jonathan-rosa/
Last edited by jon jon on Nov-07-2007 at 14:43
|
|
Nov-05-2007 16:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zentac_75
At least I'm housebroken

Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Burlington, Ontario
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by jon jon
I've heard some of the debunking but not in relation to these particular claims. Can someone take the time and post them? Or point me in the right direction SPECIFICALLY on these comments please.
I disagree completely, in fact one of the concurrent themes in the doc is that information/idealogies can be so blantantly real, true, and right in front of your face people don't even notice it. Think Hitler in Mein Kempf.... Also people are scared to believe in said ideas. For some it would mean completely rejecting a way of life (in particular in relation to institutional religion), people would rather succomb to a falsehood, it's so much "easier" than challenging and questioning.
|
My call for BS was targeted specifically at the 911 portion of zeitgeist and the "loose change' documentery.
I realize my comments were a little of the top. I know that my assumption holds no weight. I just had to point out that If the US can accomplish all the things that David Avery accuses them of in his documentary, than surly they can make him 'disapear'.
I just really believe that the simplist explanation is the correct one, and the version of events that is presented by the 911 conspiracy theorists is offly complex.
Anyway.... here is some counter-documentaries in regards to loose change. If you watched and enjoyed the 911 theories in zeitgeist you should watch and enjoy the following.
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews...e/pentagon.html
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/...ose_change.html
http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
In a debate against Mark Roberts, creator of the "Loose Change 2nd Edition Viewers Guide" and Ronald Wieck, contributor to the American Thinker, on Hardfire, a local NYC cable program, Dylan Avery stated that:
"I would be the first to admit that our film definitely contained errors, it still does contain some dubious claims, and it does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts."
___________________
"I don't judge anyone except myself; you shouldn't either."
Last edited by Zentac_75 on Nov-05-2007 at 16:48
|
|
Nov-05-2007 16:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
jon jon
viva la clubland

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Footwork
|
|
|
Nov-06-2007 02:17
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:05.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|