What business does Iran have in Iraq providing weapons to insurgents? If they are so peaceful, why can't they play by the rules?

___________________
Vernato

quote:

Originally posted by Fir3start3r Yes, because Iran just keeps to themselves doesn't interfere in other countries politics at all!

Iran doesn't OCCUPY other countries. Iran itself was the one occupied for decades, and had foreign interference in their own politics. 1979, they shook off this interference, and declared itself enemies to those perceived to be most responsible for foreign interference, Israel and the US. The US because of the espionage of the 1950's, and shah and saddam hussein support. Israel because they feel Israel seeks to keep the Middle East marginalized and keep Israel the top military power in the region.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Kapedan What business does US have in Iraq providing weapons to insurgents? If they are so peaceful, why can't they play by the rules?

FIXED...

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of weapons given to the Iraq government are....missing...Who is the #1 weapons proliferator in the world?...It ain't Iran...

Iraq did not attack the US, yet they are occupied by the US. Why can't our executive branch play by the rules?

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Kapedan What business does Iran have in Iraq providing weapons to insurgents? If they are so peaceful, why can't they play by the rules?

You realize that the French gave weapons and funds to the colonists, right? Hell, they even provided military leaders to assist organizing the colonists. Does that make them "not peaceful."

___________________
"Go back to bed america your government is in control
Here's American Gladiators, here is 56 channels of it,
Watch these picturary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom,
Here you go America you are free to do as we tell you
We want your soul
Your cash, your house, your phone, your cash, your house, your life" -Adam Freeland - We Want Your Soul

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton FIXED... HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of weapons given to the Iraq government are....missing...Who is the #1 weapons proliferator in the world?...It ain't Iran... Iraq did not attack the US, yet they are occupied by the US. Why can't our executive branch play by the rules?

My friend, losing weapons and providing weapons are two different things. Dont tell me now that the U.S purposely gave weapons to the insurgents in Iraq. That also does not make it excusable for Iran do be doing the same thing.

___________________
Vernato

quote:

Originally posted by Groundhog Boy You realize that the French gave weapons and funds to the colonists, right? Hell, they even provided military leaders to assist organizing the colonists. Does that make them "not peaceful."

Not for the British. Also, comparing that with Iraq is a bit off dont you think?

___________________
Vernato

quote:

Originally posted by Kapedan My friend, losing weapons and providing weapons are two different things. Dont tell me now that the U.S purposely gave weapons to the insurgents in Iraq. That also does not make it excusable for Iran do be doing the same thing.

YES!!!!

We've equipped the same insurgents who were so bad, the American's called the Anbar Province "Triangle of Death". One American commander even wrote the Anbar province off as a "lost territory." Now we've equipped them, and also the shiites, whose government is infiltrated by sectarian death squads who have killed thousands of people and this is by killers in OFFICIAL UNIFORM. We've equipped them. We also equip the MEK, an anti-Iranian terrorist organization on the US FOREIGN TERRORIST LIST. We've supported the terrorist Contras in Nicaragua. We have supported coups, revolutions, and even osama bin laden....

And bush/cheney whackjobs keep yappin as if we don't support terrorism, and have all the fun in the world labeling other countries who do the EXACT SAME THING WE DO!!

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Kapedan Not for the British. Also, comparing that with Iraq is a bit off dont you think?

He is comparing insurgencies. The American Revolution was an insurgency...

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Kapedan My friend, losing weapons and providing weapons are two different things.

Who is ultimately responsible for those weapons being lost?

quote:

Dont tell me now that the U.S purposely gave weapons to the insurgents in Iraq.

Where ya been the past few months?:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/11/w.../11iraq.html?hp

quote:

That also does not make it excusable for Iran do be doing the same thing.

Perhaps not, but it does seem to demonstrate us being hypocritical asses, does it not?

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by Kapedan Not for the British. Also, comparing that with Iraq is a bit off dont you think?

When did the colonists become the British? As for the Iraq = colonists thing, I think our Commander in Chief made that reference first. Remember trying to get them democracy...

The point I was analogizing was that Iran is, much like the French did, funding the people that they hope will control Iraq. It doesn't that we call them part of the Axis of Evil. I mean, who the hell would you support in that instance?

___________________
"Go back to bed america your government is in control
Here's American Gladiators, here is 56 channels of it,
Watch these picturary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom,
Here you go America you are free to do as we tell you
We want your soul
Your cash, your house, your phone, your cash, your house, your life" -Adam Freeland - We Want Your Soul

Last edited by Groundhog Boy on Nov-18-2007 at 05:08

quote:

Originally posted by Kapedan What business does Iran have in Iraq providing weapons to insurgents? If they are so peaceful, why can't they play by the rules?

what business does the U.S have to be in Iraq?Why are they providing weapons to the Sunni's to fight the the shia's?

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

Iran has every right to fund their Shia neighbors. If Canada were to be attacked do you think the US would send them funding and weapons? Damn right we would because they're our neighbors, and we have quite a bit in common. Same with Iran. The only two countries in the middle east with Shia majorities are Iraq and Iran, so if you understand the hatred between Sunni and Shia you would realize that of course Iran is going to help them.

I consider it to be a huge hypocrisy that the only nation who has used nuclear arms and who is constantly at war seeks to keep others from arming themselves.

___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.

Latest Mix