|
| quote: | Originally posted by CReddick
About the picture / sound... it really depends on the studio. At WB, we re-use the same compression for both formats... so for example the movie '300' on HD and BD are quality wise are exactly the same. the HD has more cool features because none of the BD Java programming works right.
yes, the earlier generations of HD players were a tad sluggish.
sorry to hijack your thread. I need a huge ass TV ASAP~! |
Well with Blu-Ray you have the ALOT of movies that are in uncompressed audio. So for the most part most of the Blu-ray movies I watch have a much better sound quality. When you have a uncompressed PCM audio at anywhere from 4.6 to 6.9 MBps, its noticeably alot better than the Dolby Digital Plus that isn't even a 1Mbps, yeah there are some Dolby TrueHD with HD-DVD, but for me the uncompressed PCM still sounds better.
But still even now, the best HD-DVD player still take a minimum of 30-45 seconds to load each disc. And almost every single Combo HD-DVD/DVD disc has failed at some point in the movie with everyone that I know, on a range of different players.
Overall I will say that almost all the HD-DVD picture look the same and they are very good. But the best Blu-Rays look better. Could just be the PS3 handles the Video better.
I personally dont give a hoot for all the extra features and what not. I just want the movie the way the director intended it, with the best possible sound. On the other hand, my dad loves all the extra features.
For me I would prefer blu-ray to take the win, but either way I don't care cause I can watch both. I have had Zero issues with Blu-Ray and about 30% of all the HD-DVD's have problems. Alot of stuttering during playback, movies just stopping dead, extremely long load times.
I don't see any clear winner, but I can tell you with Blockbuster backing Blu-ray, they have a huge advantage from that alone.
|