|
There's no way that I know of to teach something like this (outside of some music theory courses that I know nothing about). You create a melody, and then create another that sounds good with it over the top of the original. Don't take the road of creating one, then creating another, then trying to mold them together. (Unless, of course, you're talented enough to know what will work beforehand.)
Post a sample of what you've got thusfar.
Stop saying 'melo', it doesn't make you cool.
Anyway, what I'm hearing in the sample you posted I'll equate to the following: First section is like a rhythm guitar part with chords and regular timing, second section is the lead guitar that plays more freely and with more expression. Don't think of the first 'rhythm' part as an outright melody, it's more of a backup, as you find out when the song continues and the main melody plays over it. If you put yourself in that mindset you'll find yourself creating a song that gains that expression as it progresses.
Just my thoughts. 
Last edited by 3F05Q on Nov-25-2007 at 19:19
|