quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN [[ LINK REMOVED ]] now, i know there's a "final cut" (which isnt that final apparently ) but this is the most recent debunking version.

quite possibly the best youtube video i have seen to date.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN I have 3 hobbies: gaming, DJing & correcting maladjusted fools on the internet.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Yeah, I’d like to know what horrible, scarring incident in your childhood turned you into such an ignorant, intellectual-hating philistine?

No.

Truthers just want a story, not work or thinking.

quote:

Originally posted by colonelcrisp depends on three factors: 1: speed of aircraft 2: field of vision of the camera (most likely no more than 100m for a gas station security camera) 3: capture rate of the camera (most likely 1-2 fps for a gas station) assuming 350 mph speed, the plane could travel almost 100m in between frames at 2fps and 160m at 1fps. the aircraft is not even 50m long, so it is more than possible that it flew throught he field of vision inbetween frames

It also depends if the plane is wearing one of those fancy new invisibility cloaks.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6064620.stm

quote:

Originally posted by atbell It also depends if the plane is wearing one of those fancy new invisibility cloaks. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6064620.stm

WOW!! I heard Willie Nelson said that the twin towers are still standing, and they have been draped with invisibility cloaks so as to keep the populace beliving that they did in fact collapse.....

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN I have 3 hobbies: gaming, DJing & correcting maladjusted fools on the internet.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Yeah, I’d like to know what horrible, scarring incident in your childhood turned you into such an ignorant, intellectual-hating philistine?