 |
|
|
|
 |
Jink
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2007
Location:
|
|
|
why can't you just continue producing with what you're good at?
|
|
Feb-20-2008 10:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
Chronosis
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Málaga
|
|
|
Feb-21-2008 10:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sebastien
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2007
Location:
|
|
|
^ What about vice versa? As in does Fl handle sequencing and making patterns 'better'?
|
|
Feb-21-2008 11:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
Chronosis
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Málaga
|
|
|
Feb-21-2008 14:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
zodiac9
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Chronosis
They operate in the same way, except they're much better in handling audio track. If you're considering recording audio in the future, you're much better off with the above mentioned software. |
I've been laying down a lot of guitar tracks lately in FL Studio, and it handles audio recording and audio file playback extremely well. It's so easy and fast once you learn the proper way of doing things.
I never got far with Cubase, and I haven't tried any other DAWS, so really can't speak about them. All I know is, FL Studio makes is fast and easy to create patterns in the piano roll, sequence, automate, ect. The only people that have a hard time learning FL Studio are Cubase users, because the layout is so different.
|
|
Feb-23-2008 00:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|