quote:

Originally posted by KilldaDJ im on a 56k, 64kbps mp3s good enuff for me, or else 128, but generally i dont mind cant stand 256+ its no difference from 160+ not for me anyway i must be going deaf or summin

not deaf, you just need better speakers!!!!

___________________
The father made fetuses with flesh licking ladies / While you and your mother were asleep in the trailer park / Thunderous sparks from the dark of the stadiums / The music and medicine you needed for comforting / So make all your fat, fleshy fingers fingers to moving / And pluck all your silly strings and / Bend all your notes for me and / Soft silly music is meaningful, magical / The movements were beautiful / All in your ovaries / All of them milking with green fleshy flowers / While powerful pistons were sugary sweet machines, / Smelling of semen all under the garden / Was all you were needing when you still believed in me.

192 because of its size/quality, don’t think it should be higher then 256...

yep...192 i find is a good balance between sq & size

256 & 320 just seem too big and don't really sound a great deal better compared to 128 vs 192

___________________
Peace 'n Love! • Mikey • Sydney, Australia.

192 is preferred, but ill take 160 if ive got no other options, but no lower
if i had cable and a huge hdd id prefer 320 as im sure everyone would

___________________
A trance tune sampling Last of the Mohicans?
ID s13 here
It's good, seriously

thanks to Louk
Gizeh - Feelin Good

fools. cant see how 320 could NOT be everyone's favorite bitrate??? he didnt ask about the size of the mp3, just the bitrate....so of course i'll choose the best one, 320......

>JM<

don't mind me, sig test

192..
best quality/size ratio.

___________________
GHF Community - for all your EDM needs!

I picked 320 kbps but, if I wanted to put more than 5 and 1/2 hours on a SINGLE CD, I'd choose 256 kbps. I'm planning on putting Magik 1 - 5 (when I buy it) on ONE MP3-CD at either 256 kbps CBR, VBR (Minimum: 256, Maximum: 320), or 320 kbps overburning CD. Of course I use the LATEST LAME encoder to get the BEST quality. I may use VBR with 112 Min, 320 Max. so I can put Magik 6 (and maybe 7) on the CD but, I don't know yet as I don't have ANY official Magiks. All other MP3-CDs that come from my albums are 320 kbps, LAME, NO QUESTIONS ASKED! My uncle can HEAR the difference. Read my posts on sound quality and you'll know why I choose 320 LAME. http://www.r3mix.net/ is good for lots of info on quality. Bye for now!

quote:

Originally posted by !_PeTrUs_! If I rip for friends I always do it in 256 nowadays. But mostly its 192 because of the scene rulez

WHAT RULES? If I was ripping from vinyl and releasing it on the 'Net, I'd use 320 kbps, LAME encoder! Why not? Release groups probably love quality so, why not (even 256's good but, not good enough to survive more than a few encodings/decodings without losing quality)?

quote:

Originally posted by ali92 even 256's good but, not good enough to survive more than a few encodings/decodings without losing quality)?

no matter what rate encoding/decoding only makes you lose quality everytime, albeit the "destruction" is stronger at lower rates that is true

i honestly cant tell much of a difference between 192 and any higher. so, 192 is good for me