autogain ftw!

^Audtogain is a big plus, no more overdriving tracks unintentionally. Its teh same timestretch as Abelton? NO wonder. Wow I can't wait!

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by RJT I think it's more like throwing a baby shower for an abortion.

quote:

Originally posted by Kevy Kev When I lived in Vegas I once peed in the elevator at the MGM, cut it off mid stream to let a family get in then finished peeing when they got out of the elevator.

Does anyone know what the pitch resolution is when using Torq with the Xponent? Used a Behringer BCD3000 on Traktor and I got a resolution of 0.2%! Could do with 0.02% really for those monster mixes.

___________________
"It's too bad she won't live, but then again who does?"

.1%/8% i believe

quote:

Originally posted by Lover Boy Does anyone know what the pitch resolution is when using Torq with the Xponent? Used a Behringer BCD3000 on Traktor and I got a resolution of 0.2%! Could do with 0.02% really for those monster mixes.

i think the main problem with using a midi controller as a pitch fader for any program is that midi only has 128 different signals, so if you would like to get 0,02% accuracy, your pitch range should then be ±1,28% which is not very much.

___________________

Get Dropbox, with 250 MB extra space!

quote:

Originally posted by skip i think the main problem with using a midi controller as a pitch fader for any program is that midi only has 128 different signals, so if you would like to get 0,02% accuracy, your pitch range should then be �1,28% which is not very much.

This is true. It's such a minor problem though...I can't believe that no one has fixed this somehow yet.

What would be ideal is if you had two pitch faders. One with .2% resolution, then a "fine tuning" one that adjusts by .02% or .01%. And they add together.

So you would get it within 1% or so with the normal pitch fader, then use the fine tuning fader to get it perfectly locked.

Of course this would probably require that the program supported this, but that would be like, 5 seconds of programming to add the possibility...

___________________
-Jon
www.DJjoncaserta.com - - mixes and whatnot (melodic progressive house and trance)

quote:

Originally posted by IntegraR0064 This is true. It's such a minor problem though...I can't believe that no one has fixed this somehow yet. What would be ideal is if you had two pitch faders. One with .2% resolution, then a "fine tuning" one that adjusts by .02% or .01%. And they add together. So you would get it within 1% or so with the normal pitch fader, then use the fine tuning fader to get it perfectly locked. Of course this would probably require that the program supported this, but that would be like, 5 seconds of programming to add the possibility...

Now that I think about it, you could even probably do this with just one pitch fader - just have it output 2 separate midi messages. It would be slightly more complicated than just using two faders, but I'm sure it would be doable.

___________________
-Jon
www.DJjoncaserta.com - - mixes and whatnot (melodic progressive house and trance)

This is the problem I found with Traktor, I got fed up of continually adjusting my mixes to keep them in time when using a Midi controller. Hopefully Torq will solve that problem, though I feel like a cheat asking the computer to do it for me.

___________________
"It's too bad she won't live, but then again who does?"

Does anyone have a final release date yet?

___________________
"It's too bad she won't live, but then again who does?"

The official word is end of 1st Q 2008 (March 31st or earlier).

Cross your fingers.

___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!

www.mixcloud.com/jluger

I hope this comes out soon...

___________________
My Soundcloud