 |
|
|
|
 |
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
|
|
|
Shit, check out this atomizer video.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=41BUEC-il3g
This thing looks so fucking awesome, I can't wait to explore the possibilities.
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
|
|
Apr-29-2008 17:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
aNYthing
Abrasive Cockhead @ Large

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Near metric fuck-a-ton of high-end gear
|
|
|
I'm sure I'll be in a minority here but may I suggest not buyin TI at all? I've had every single one of TI iterations and they all had UNFIXABLE problems.
1. Multimode is unreliable on best days. On other days it plain and simple SUCKS. Imagine playing a multipatch that keeps getting stuck with only 2 parts - and this is on TI Kbd, Polar, or desktop
2. Clicks, pops, etc - bugs galore.
3. Horrible issues when used with USB and TI software.
4. Using TI as a "soundcard" over USB is virtually useless due to horrific latency, clicks/pops, and awful stability issues
5. CRAPLOAD of unresolved problems which will never be fixed due to hardware limitations.
6. Completely bogus polyphony numbers. I can take the same patches on my Virus C and run a multipatch without any problems or running out of voices. Same patch on TI goes ape-crap and runs out of polyphony.
7. TI sounds "colder" than Virus C. I can't explain it but same patches on Virus C sound more "analog" than they do on TI.
8. Even running in single mode, you still get stuck notes, cracks, pops, etc.
Bottom line - TI is like Windows Vista - you either love it or hate it but regardless of your like/dislike you will have tons of problems to work through.
I like Virus C simplicity and stability as well. I've seen soooo many live acts have problems with Virus TI on stage that it amazes me that people would continue using this POS. Thomas Dolby was down due to TI malfunction for about 10 minutes on the 1st show I saw him and then another one he did with BT. Saw several local bands that used TI have lock up issues in live gig as well.
I think you're better off buying a Virus C (at much cheaper price) which has most of the features of TI. All the gizmos they added to TI are not worth the instability or frustration.
Check out a this little file I created while messing around with my polar. All synth parts are TI Multi, all drum sounds are PX-7. No sequencer, directly connected to MOTU 828 MK2 and recorded straight to Sony Soundforge 8. Sorry for mistakes. The only connections are Audio & MIDI (no USB).
http://www.cynep.com/sounds/fuxord1.mp3
Artifacts:
@52 sec, @1:10 - clicks, @2:17 voice loss, @2:36 noise, @5:22 noise, @5:27 - filter "bump" - and those are just some of the more obvious ones.
BTW, the multi-patch I created (and saved) for this track vanished after I turned virus on/off. Actually, the name and sounds stayed but all arp patterns and some other multi-settings did not get saved.
JUST AN FYI.
___________________
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
|
|
Apr-29-2008 22:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
|
|
|
I've read about all of the above problems and believe you, but for what it's worth the only of the above I've ever experienced is the latency, but since I don't play keyboard in a live setting it's not an issue.
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
|
|
Apr-29-2008 22:11
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I didn't want to start a new one.
So, the time has finally come when I feel like maybe I want some hardware, and some second hand Tis have started coming up on ebay, so I just had a couple of questions:
first, whats the Tis advantages over the C? Obviously its got the integration thing, but I'm not using it as a soundcard so otherwise?
What's the difference in polyphony between the two (I know C's supposed to be 32 and Tis sposed to be 84) in real terms? I know that people say you don't get anywhere near the quoted polyphony with the Ti, so how much better is it really?
What other advantages does the Ti have over the C that you find helpful?
Is anyone using it with Ableton? If so, how's the stability looking?
How much bandwidth does it chew up USB wise?
So I guess my real question is, is a Ti worth another 5-600 dollars compared to a C?
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Jun-17-2008 08:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
gr8ape
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2005
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Derivative
Does anyone seriously use all 16 parts though? I use multi mode alot but even then I pretty much never use more than 2 or 3 parts and not because of polyphony limitations. It just gets messy after that and mixing them all together and editing singles is slow and annoying. |
i dont, ill get maybe 8-9 patches max, and even then, i record parts progressively so i always have like 2-3 channels playing at most
I know the ti has more waveforms, more waveform shaping options, and for the rest im not sure. But theres like hundreds of wavetable waveforms that you can morph together and stuff like that, makes for really cool sounds. Theres also the supersquare I believe lol
|
|
Jun-17-2008 12:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
Eldritch
Eldritch Project

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by kitphillips
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I didn't want to start a new one.
So, the time has finally come when I feel like maybe I want some hardware, and some second hand Tis have started coming up on ebay, so I just had a couple of questions:
first, whats the Tis advantages over the C? Obviously its got the integration thing, but I'm not using it as a soundcard so otherwise?
What's the difference in polyphony between the two (I know C's supposed to be 32 and Tis sposed to be 84) in real terms? I know that people say you don't get anywhere near the quoted polyphony with the Ti, so how much better is it really?
What other advantages does the Ti have over the C that you find helpful?
Is anyone using it with Ableton? If so, how's the stability looking?
How much bandwidth does it chew up USB wise?
So I guess my real question is, is a Ti worth another 5-600 dollars compared to a C? |
What you get with the TI:
- Hypersaw
- Wave/Formant/Grain-tables
- Separate reverb and delay effects for all parts. (The Virus C only allows sends.)
- VSTi integration
- Higher resolution LCD screen.
- An extra assignable knob.
- Expanded mod matrix.
- Double DSP. (This means it has aproximately double the polyphony of the Virus C, but each DSP can only be used on separate parts.)
- Crappy dynamic voice allocation algorithm. (It sometimes screws up and results in pops and crackles.)
- Bugs
|
|
Jun-17-2008 12:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
Khayat
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Neverland
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Eldritch
- Bugs |
LOL
___________________
Stooped Cat
| quote: | | Life is to short to listen to something else than Trance |
|
|
Jun-17-2008 13:41
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Eldritch
- Crappy dynamic voice allocation algorithm. (It sometimes screws up and results in pops and crackles.)
- Bugs |
These unique features haven't been changed yet? I mean its been out a long time now... Does this stuff still happen if its run in standalone mode, with no VST integration?
That stuff about the atomiser might have just sold me on the thing...
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Jun-17-2008 14:33
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:57.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|