|
| quote: | Originally posted by TO guy
It's not necessarily a better product. |
Personally, I disagree, but it's not a question of whether or not it's objectively better or worse. Maybe Rockstar is a better drink but maybe I'm just allergic to all the ginseng and "natural" shit they put in it. Or maybe it's better but also cheaper, and I'm getting charged the higher price. Whatever the case may be, I expect to get what I ordered.
When I order a Red Bull, I should get a Red Bull and not a Rockstar. If I order a steak, I expect to get beef and not chicken. Red Bull isn't a generic word for "energy drink" - it's a specific brand name referring to a specific thing, and anyone who sells a different product under the same name is swindling me, even if they genuinely believe that they're giving me something better.
I forget who gave the Coke example earlier, maybe it was you. It's true - "Coke" has become kind of a generic name for any cola-type drink. That's exactly what happens when companies fail to protect their trademarks - they become genericized. It's not just their loss, it's also ours; when you order a coke, you never know whether or not you'll end up getting a Pepsi instead, and even though some people like Pepsi better, the ones who don't are getting screwed.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|