Originally posted by Kinezi
Takes pyramides out of egypt and its an alaskan desert.
The whole article is bullshit.. the fact remains that Jordan and Egypt did what it did in to maintain power and authotrian king of jordan style rule.. they dont want muslim clerics to form parellel political party and challenge their power and authority..
If you think they do it to curb the so called 'terrorism' than you are just pleasing yourself...
thats rather simplistic. youre not thinking it all the way through.
Countries like Egypt and Jordan, who are like you said autocratic or plutocratic or whatever authoritaian-cratic they may be, are fully aware of what fundamental Islam is capable of. probably more than anyone else.
i think pkc would agree, the fact that hardliners and their followers are most certainly capable of using terror tactics in order to "form parellel political party and challenge their power and authority" is reason enough to be as tough on terrorist as they are.
at the end of the day, what we're talking about here is the murder of innocent people and how to prevent it no matter who in in the seat of power.
May-28-2008 04:12
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
yeah, i agree. the laws themselves are evidence enough that there is a problem according to the people in charge. whether the people in charge are nice hippies or abusive tyrants is quite irrelevant.
___________________
May-28-2008 04:13
kiev_42
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: your walls
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
Nah, the gas didnt' kill them. When the terrorists realized what was happening, they detonated all of their bombs.
it was sleeping gas, they all fell asleep and then the squads went in and arrested the terrorists while saving the hostages / dateraping women
___________________
Как много тех, с кем можно лечь в постель. Как мало тех, с кем хочется проснуться…
May-28-2008 05:24
Kinezi
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2008
Location: Location
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
hardliners and their followers are most certainly capable of using terror tactics in order to "form parellel political party and challenge their power and authority" is reason enough to be as tough on terrorist as they are.
So as in your own words these rulers of Jordan and Egypt are aware of threat to there rein and power that hardliners and their followers posses. So in order to curtail these threats against there 'rule' they have totalitarian hardline severe in your face death laws to prevent uprising.
And not because:
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
at the end of the day, the murder of innocent people.
Countries like Jordan and Egypt dont give a rat ass about the so called 'trrorist'... they dont have these laws to curb 'terrorism' as the article states.. they have these laws to maintain there power and totalitarian rule.
May-28-2008 06:06
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
quote:
Originally posted by Kinezi
they have these laws to maintain there power and totalitarian rule.
dude listen, you're absolutely correct..."they have these laws to maintain their power" against acts of terror. these are the threats they recognize, this is how they deal with it. in that respect, no civilized government is any different. it's just some are more vulnerable than others.
May-28-2008 06:14
atbell
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by Kinezi
I claim Aruba, Mongolia and Alaska has been most effecient governments in curbing terrorism... well wait.. I need to write a long lengthy article about it and publish it in local midday newspaper here.. than i will need to quote that link here and prove you wrong.
LOL - I like your thinking. If you ever decide to buy a local paper let me know so I can write articles and quote myself too!
