LOL, I wasn't debating that... just A+H's design choice.
This past weekend I'd played out on a rotary with:
1. No eq's
2. No gains
3. No meters
And it came out pretty good
quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Bizarre or not, you learn to mix with your ears instead of your eyes and you're going to be a better DJ.
Aug-08-2008 19:53
Rememberence_
James Packer
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: HXTA #6
I have a Xone:32 and I never understood why people see the location of the gains as a downfall of the design. It seems that anyone who has actually used a Xone:32 will tell you they don't give a rats ass. I personally like that they are out of the way, rather than taking up real estate on the faceplate.
___________________
"I played 12.30 til close at 3am at the club (Antro), following on from an Australian dj,
which seemed unusual in deepest Texas." - Judge Jules
Aug-08-2008 20:08
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
What if you wanted to flush mount the mixer?
It might be easy to work around, but it's still odd. I've never seen it on another mixer. I don't even like controls on the front of mixers.
A+H tends to do odd things sometimes. Like the headphone jack IN THE MIDDLE of the Xone S2. Forces you to use the second one underneath the mixer, or wrap your headphone cable around the headphone cable hook they put on the thing. It's weird.
quote:
Originally posted by Rememberence_
I have a Xone:32 and I never understood why people see the location of the gains as a downfall of the design. It seems that anyone who has actually used a Xone:32 will tell you they don't give a rats ass. I personally like that they are out of the way, rather than taking up real estate on the faceplate.
Aug-08-2008 20:55
TranceOwnsLol
Hi mom!!!
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Singapore
So I guess there really is no comparison with the Xone 42/32 to the DJM 400/700.
BTW, with CDJs, what's the advantage between 400s and 200s from your experience besides that the 400 lets you connect to external hard drives and that it has a USB port.
Aug-08-2008 21:30
Ryan0751
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2005
Location: Boston, MA
The platter on the 400 supports vinyl emulation and feels about 100 times better than on the 200.
quote:
Originally posted by TranceOwnsLol
So I guess there really is no comparison with the Xone 42/32 to the DJM 400/700.
BTW, with CDJs, what's the advantage between 400s and 200s from your experience besides that the 400 lets you connect to external hard drives and that it has a USB port.
Aug-08-2008 21:39
djdk
Nutritional Overachiever
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London
I have a 42 and I cant recommend it enough, quality mixer all round really
I just asked about the prices of the mixers and the CDJs and here's what I got:
Xone 32 - 660€
Xone 62 - 950€
the Pioneer CDJ 400 is 430€ each.
Are these okay prices?
Aug-11-2008 06:25
alefort
Melanie is the bestest!
Registered: May 2005
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by TranceOwnsLol
I just asked about the prices of the mixers and the CDJs and here's what I got:
Xone 32 - 660€
Xone 62 - 950€
the Pioneer CDJ 400 is 430€ each.
Are these okay prices?
Am I ever glad to be in North America. I can get the Xone 62 for 800 CAD, quite the steal compared to the price you've listed in Euros.
Aug-11-2008 06:38
SBK
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Gdansk, Poland
Hello
There are others brands than Pioneer and Allen & Heath on the market that offers quality mixers.
Check out the new Ecler Evo 4, like all eclers great build quality and sound and it has 2 effect sections that can run at once + midi. Dont have to add that desing and layout is great My next mixer for sure.